INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
I love this
I love this
This is what would happen when the HUMANISTS UK failed to compete/or take part
Analysis: Why does the Government like faith schools, and why do religious groups like the free schools programme?
Organised religion has been one of the major beneficiaries of the Government's flagship free schools policy
https://inews.co.uk/news/education/anal ... ls-1387057
Analysis: Why does the Government like faith schools, and why do religious groups like the free schools programme?
Organised religion has been one of the major beneficiaries of the Government's flagship free schools policy
https://inews.co.uk/news/education/anal ... ls-1387057
Re: I love this
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: I love this
Another Humanists UK failure
Challenge to new Catholic school in Peterborough rejected
https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2020 ... h-rejected
Challenge to new Catholic school in Peterborough rejected
https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2020 ... h-rejected
Re: I love this
Church of England education leaders are urged to work together with ‘honesty and prayer’
Educational leaders should "work together with honesty and prayer", the archbishop of Canterbury has said, as the C of E launched a new resource at its national education conference
https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/ ... and-prayer
Educational leaders should "work together with honesty and prayer", the archbishop of Canterbury has said, as the C of E launched a new resource at its national education conference
https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/ ... and-prayer
Re: I love this
Look like another Humanists UK failure
A look at the new 1,400 place Hindu free school planned in Leicester
The scheme could be approved next week
https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news ... ee-3843635
A look at the new 1,400 place Hindu free school planned in Leicester
The scheme could be approved next week
https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news ... ee-3843635
Re: I love this
No humanism is not been overlooked at all, people are just not like what Humanists UK is offering them.
https://twitter.com/Humanists_UK/status ... 53600?s=20
https://twitter.com/Humanists_UK/status ... 53600?s=20
Re: I love this
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: I love this
Another Humanists UK failure
House of Commons to begin serving halal and kosher food following MPs' appeal
https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/ho ... lowing-mps
House of Commons to begin serving halal and kosher food following MPs' appeal
https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/ho ... lowing-mps
Re: I love this
I really don't know whey you're bothering to tell us this.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: I love this
If they don't know that they are not very effective, they are not going to change are they? So somebody has got to say something.
Re: I love this
It presupposes they are not being effective, but why are you bothering to tell us here. We're not Humanists UK.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: I love this
Bizarre.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: I love this
If you follow this webpage, you usually find a lot more humanists uk failures than there are successes. And they still don't know why it is so!
The reglious folks usually(almost all of the times) win all the key battles.
https://www.secularism.org.uk/in-the-media.html
The reglious folks usually(almost all of the times) win all the key battles.
https://www.secularism.org.uk/in-the-media.html
Re: I love this
ROFL!
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: I love this
Another Humanists UK fail
Key workers: religious workers can continue to send their children to school
https://www.christiantoday.com/article/ ... 134496.htm
Key workers: religious workers can continue to send their children to school
https://www.christiantoday.com/article/ ... 134496.htm
Re: I love this
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?