INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our
Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
...on serious topics that don't fit anywhere else at present.
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#81
Post
by Alan H » June 12th, 2019, 11:55 am
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#85
Post
by Alan H » June 13th, 2019, 11:45 am
We've not left yet, coffee.
Are the unicorns and rainbows been sourced yet?
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
coffee
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: June 2nd, 2009, 4:53 pm
#86
Post
by coffee » June 13th, 2019, 4:30 pm
Yet another boost for the economy as Lidl announces a huge UK expansion.
The supermarket giant will create 40 new stores in the Capital, as well as a brand new HQ in the city.
London is and always will be an extremely attractive investment opportunity.
https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/sta ... 9379598341
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#87
Post
by Alan H » June 13th, 2019, 5:51 pm
Wot? Are they going to but the unicorns and rainbows at Lidl? I don't think that was what we were promised...
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
coffee
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: June 2nd, 2009, 4:53 pm
#88
Post
by coffee » June 14th, 2019, 11:03 am
Lucy Harris
@Lugey6
So I went to the EU for the first time yesterday, here are some take aways:
1.) MEPs absolutely cannot make ANY legislation
2.) There are lobbying firms EVERYWHERE
3.) There are some guys who walk around in tux tail coats & tell you you can't do stuff.
https://twitter.com/Lugey6/status/1138876475501961217
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#89
Post
by Alan H » June 14th, 2019, 12:58 pm
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
coffee
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: June 2nd, 2009, 4:53 pm
#90
Post
by coffee » June 14th, 2019, 4:51 pm
Even the Remainer head of the civil service, Sir Mark Sedwill, is now admitting that Britain is in "pretty good shape" for a WTO Brexit. There's no excuse for anybody to continue fear-mongering about national independence or not deliver by October 31. Get on with it!
https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/sta ... 2677729281
==================================
The Brexit Party is now consistently leading the polls. It's clear the era of the two-party system is dead.
It's Remain vs Leave - any party caught in No Man's Land will be wiped out. @Conservatives, you've had enough warnings...
Support us at http://www.leave.eu/get-involved
https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/sta ... 0791311360
================================
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#91
Post
by Alan H » June 14th, 2019, 6:18 pm
You really are taken in by this shite, aren't you, coffee? Hook, line and sinker.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#92
Post
by Alan H » June 14th, 2019, 7:26 pm
Are you all for proroguing of Parliament to guarantee we 'take back control, coffee?
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#93
Post
by Alan H » June 14th, 2019, 11:32 pm
For a change, coffee, how about reading something intelligent on Brexit?
The Brexit Blog: The race to wield the no-deal scalpel
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
coffee
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: June 2nd, 2009, 4:53 pm
#94
Post
by coffee » June 15th, 2019, 7:32 am
Cambridgeshire police confirm they are investigating five allegations of electoral fraud in the Peterborough by-election including boasts on social media of an individual burning "1000 votes for the Brexit Party" and the alleged involvement of convicted vote-rigger Tariq Mahmood.
https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial/sta ... 5587167232
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#96
Post
by Alan H » June 15th, 2019, 11:50 am
Oops!
- Extreme-Irony.gif (248.89 KiB) Viewed 15947 times
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#99
Post
by Alan H » June 15th, 2019, 3:41 pm
Was that stolen from The Onion or Newsthump, coffee? It's tremendous satire.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#101
Post
by Alan H » June 15th, 2019, 8:13 pm
Fantastic work of fiction!
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?