INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.

For further information, see our Privacy Policy.

Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

We are not accepting any new registrations.

The making of the Perfect Humanist

Just a place where all John's threads can be kept nice and tidy.
Message
Author
User avatar
John Jones
Official Pet Troll
Posts: 29
Joined: October 18th, 2010, 7:21 pm

Re: The making of the Perfect Humanist

#21 Post by John Jones » October 28th, 2010, 2:19 pm

Latest post of the previous page:

thundril wrote:I suggest there is no such thing as a wrong thought.
Some actions are certainly wrong, (IMO) but the only wrong thought is thoughtlessness.

Here's a wrong thought:
I said to myself "man was made whole".
And then something else, a non-physical autonomous agent in the corner of the room said back to me,
"if we were made whole why are we alone?"

(Don't get up too quickly, there is the possibility of fainting or spilling ones cup of tea. Check that there is nothing on the stove before replying)

User avatar
jaywhat
Posts: 15807
Joined: July 5th, 2007, 5:53 pm

Re: The making of the Perfect Humanist

#22 Post by jaywhat » October 28th, 2010, 4:17 pm

Man was not made whole. Man was not made at all. Man, along with orchids and toads and elephants, evolved.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The making of the Perfect Humanist

#23 Post by Alan H » October 28th, 2010, 5:42 pm

John Jones wrote:Here's a wrong thought:
I said to myself "man was made whole".
And then something else, a non-physical autonomous agent in the corner of the room said back to me,
"if we were made whole why are we alone?"

(Don't get up too quickly, there is the possibility of fainting or spilling ones cup of tea. Check that there is nothing on the stove before replying)
You are talking in riddles.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

Maria Mac
Site Admin
Posts: 9306
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:34 pm

Re: The making of the Perfect Humanist

#24 Post by Maria Mac » October 29th, 2010, 11:50 am

John Jones wrote:
getreal wrote:*I really, really want another piece of chocolate cake*

Help! I've had a wrong thought. What should I do?

You should get out of here. Isn't that what happens to everyone else who has wrong thoughts here?
No, it isn't. And this idiotic remark wins you official troll status.

Locked