INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy. Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy. Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
Hawking's new book says creator redundant
Hawking's new book says creator redundant
In "The Grand Design," co-authored with U.S. physicist Leonard Mlodinow, Hawking says a new series of theories made a creator of the universe redundant, according to the Times newspaper which published extracts on Thursday.
"Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist," Hawking writes.
The book goes on sale next week.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE6811GN20100902
"Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist," Hawking writes.
The book goes on sale next week.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE6811GN20100902
This is one of the great social functions of science - to free people of superstition. - Steven Weinberg
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
Do you believe God created the Universe? Vote in the Daily Fail's poll to decide the issue...(scroll down the page a bit).
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
So far the "nays" have it, 58% to 42%.Alan H wrote:Do you believe God created the Universe? Vote in the Daily Fail's poll to decide the issue...(scroll down the page a bit).
This is one of the great social functions of science - to free people of superstition. - Steven Weinberg
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
Aarrgghh! That is BAD user interface design: they have the order as Yes above No when you vote but the other way around when they show the results. I think I may have misread it earlier.Ken H wrote:So far the "nays" have it, 58% to 42%.Alan H wrote:Do you believe God created the Universe? Vote in the Daily Fail's poll to decide the issue...(scroll down the page a bit).
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
We have a devout (or should I say fanatical) Anglican where I work. Yesterday a workmate relayed the Hawking's news to her. Her response was astonishing -
"That explains why he is in a wheelchair then!"
"That explains why he is in a wheelchair then!"
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
It's incredible, but not surprising that some people think that way. How would she explain that he is the longest living person with ALS? I wonder if he would have made so many influential discoveries if it were not for his disease, and the time it allowed him to devote his mental powers to cosmology?Mike wrote:We have a devout (or should I say fanatical) Anglican where I work. Yesterday a workmate relayed the Hawking's news to her. Her response was astonishing -
"That explains why he is in a wheelchair then!"
BTW, President Obama awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom last year.
(Pres. Bush gave that award to religious leader and LDS church President Gordon Hinkley and also to Tony Blair).
This is one of the great social functions of science - to free people of superstition. - Steven Weinberg
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
I seem to remember that Hawking was well on course to be someone special in science before the effects of his condition became noticeable.
I wonder how much of that time he has is taken up in composing his next sentence on his machine? In the last bio I saw on him he had refused later, faster machines with better synthesis, preferring the one that has become part of his public image for so many years.
I wonder how much of that time he has is taken up in composing his next sentence on his machine? In the last bio I saw on him he had refused later, faster machines with better synthesis, preferring the one that has become part of his public image for so many years.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015
Me, 2015
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
Are you saying he isn't someone special in science?
--- mind you, I would prefer him no to use the 'design' word
- as some reverend in yesterday Guardian letters says 'design indicates a designer' !!
--- mind you, I would prefer him no to use the 'design' word

Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
No smiley after the first sentence? I was meaning that is is not necessarily his condition that made him the brain box that he is.jaywhat wrote:Are you saying he isn't someone special in science?
--- mind you, I would prefer him no to use the 'design' word- as some reverend in yesterday Guardian letters says 'design indicates a designer' !!
Yes, I listened twice to see the context he used the (loaded in this context) word "design" in. I think it was a bit of an error.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015
Me, 2015
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
I'm wondering if Hawking's book is going to convince anybody. Any thoughts on this?
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
I always wonder about this - there is something of "preaching to the converted" about such things.
Those that are prone to agree with Hawking's take on the subject will be prone to buy the book to boost their own views.
Is this book going into the grey area between popular academic stuff, as I think "A Short History . . ." and others have been, or is it edging into "theology" (or "atheology"?) as have Dawkins books over their evolution?
Those that are prone to agree with Hawking's take on the subject will be prone to buy the book to boost their own views.
Is this book going into the grey area between popular academic stuff, as I think "A Short History . . ." and others have been, or is it edging into "theology" (or "atheology"?) as have Dawkins books over their evolution?
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015
Me, 2015
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
A kind of New Age spirituality (for want of a better word), but based on Science? That's a great idea! That's also what Carl Sagan had in mind, isn't it?Dave B wrote: Is this book going into the grey area between popular academic stuff, as I think "A Short History . . ." and others have been, or is it edging into "theology" (or "atheology"?) as have Dawkins books over their evolution?
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
I have noticed a tendency in the media for people to regard it as a revelation of truth. The churches have felt the need to justify themselves by trying to say that religion, god and faith are not the same thing at all. It's one more nail in the churches' coffin, and quite a big one at that.
- Emma Woolgatherer
- Posts: 2976
- Joined: February 27th, 2008, 12:17 pm
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
It might have convinced Anthony Flew, if only he'd lived long enough and in good enough health to read it.Daniel P wrote:I'm wondering if Hawking's book is going to convince anybody. Any thoughts on this?
Emma
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
The creator of the universe has been made redundant? I knew the economy was in a dire state, but I didn’t know things had got that bad. 

Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant

Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
Wot? You think there's only one Universe out there?Nick wrote:Well once you've created the universe, you've rather worked yourself out of a job, haven't you.....?
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
Is there a different god for every one or is it that being an infinite being an infinite number of universes is no problem?Alan H wrote:Wot? You think there's only one Universe out there?Nick wrote:Well once you've created the universe, you've rather worked yourself out of a job, haven't you.....?
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015
Me, 2015
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
Good question! Although an infinity of infinite gods does make the mind boggle.Dave B wrote:Is there a different god for every one or is it that being an infinite being an infinite number of universes is no problem?
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: Hawking's new book says creator redundant
Vaguely relevant here (couldn't see where else to put it!), my article just published on The 21st Floor:
Being a dick to Dick?
Being a dick to Dick?
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?