Bit of a plug:
In the late 1990s/early 2000s, G.W. Foote & Co (publisher of The Freethinker) released 5 titles in a series of classic secularist and humanist texts. These are now all available electronically from Amazon for Kindle:
G.W. Foote, Secularism: the true philosophy of life
http://amzn.to/2fvdLn1
P.B. Shelley, The Necessity of Atheism
http://amzn.to/2gbnznF
E.M. Forster, What I Believe, and other essays:
http://amzn.to/2hLYoee
Denis Diderot, Thoughts on Religion
http://amzn.to/2eV1IDk
Marquis de Sade, Dialogue Between a Priest and a Dying Man
http://amzn.to/2fhVs70
INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
Freethinker's Classics now available for Kindle
Re: Freethinker's Classics now available for Kindle
Excellent! Thanks for letting us know, Dan.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?