INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our
Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
...on serious topics that don't fit anywhere else at present.
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#41
Post
by Alan H » May 16th, 2019, 5:33 pm
Latest post of the previous page:
Not according to my MP!
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#42
Post
by Alan H » May 16th, 2019, 7:52 pm
Who funds Farage?
https://twitter.com/Channel4News/status ... 1587919876
- 2019-05-16_18h16_30.jpg (82.65 KiB) Viewed 16933 times
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#44
Post
by Alan H » May 17th, 2019, 10:51 am
Nah. seems highly unlikely. labour would be punished at the polls next week if they were seen to prop up the Tories any more. I suspect they will suffer e hammering anyway for their equivocation so far, but enabling the Toties will be the last straw for many.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#45
Post
by Alan H » May 17th, 2019, 11:04 am
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#46
Post
by Alan H » May 17th, 2019, 11:22 am
Ha! I misread your last post, coffee! I thought it said there was an agreement! Not enough caffeine... That's the problem with silly coloured text.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#48
Post
by Alan H » May 17th, 2019, 4:00 pm
Are these the elections to elect people to represent us in that undemocratic European Parliament?
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#51
Post
by Alan H » May 18th, 2019, 9:28 pm
Corbyn is slower than most other humans...
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#52
Post
by Alan H » May 18th, 2019, 9:53 pm
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#54
Post
by Alan H » May 19th, 2019, 1:52 pm
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#55
Post
by Alan H » May 19th, 2019, 1:52 pm
How long will we suffer after Brexit, coffee?
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
animist
- Posts: 6522
- Joined: July 30th, 2010, 11:36 pm
#56
Post
by animist » May 26th, 2019, 1:14 pm
having apparently failed to correctly predict that Soft Brexit would be the end result of the 2016 referendum, I now do the same for a relatively simple Parliamentary vote some time in October to revoke Article 50
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#58
Post
by Alan H » May 27th, 2019, 11:38 am
Ah, Brexit supporters got 32.6% of the vote, down from 52% at the Referendum... not a good day for them.
Overall, bad news for Brexiteers:
- screenshot-www.bbc.co.uk-2019.05.27-11-37-31.png (56.95 KiB) Viewed 16794 times
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#61
Post
by Alan H » June 7th, 2019, 5:48 pm
Not very good news for Brexiteers... I read that Farage was furious.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?