INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
Sign this Parliamentary petition
Sign this Parliamentary petition
UK Independence Party (UKIP) shared a post.
UN's Global Compact for Migration expands on 'hate speech' to criminalise criticism of migration.
The UK must not agree to UN's Global Compact for Migration. Sign this Parliaemtary petition:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petition ... j6JSU4mF6c
UN's Global Compact for Migration expands on 'hate speech' to criminalise criticism of migration.
The UK must not agree to UN's Global Compact for Migration. Sign this Parliaemtary petition:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petition ... j6JSU4mF6c
Re: Sign this Parliamentary petition
The petition gives zero details, so there is zero chance anyone other than rabid racists will just sign.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: Sign this Parliamentary petition
Westmonster
Verified account
@WestmonsterUK
SALVINI: Italy not signing UN Migration Pact, Parliament must debate.
Austria, America, Australia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland are also refusing to sign up!
https://twitter.com/WestmonsterUK/statu ... 1858731008
Verified account
@WestmonsterUK
SALVINI: Italy not signing UN Migration Pact, Parliament must debate.
Austria, America, Australia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland are also refusing to sign up!
https://twitter.com/WestmonsterUK/statu ... 1858731008
Re: Sign this Parliamentary petition
Any, you know, actual details of this, coffee?
If not, is it safe to assume it's simply xenophobic or racist nonsense?
If not, is it safe to assume it's simply xenophobic or racist nonsense?
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: Sign this Parliamentary petition
is this what you are talking about, coffee?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internati ... r_Families
ISTM that protection of migrant workers and families is a good thing and not necessarily the same as advocating unrestricted migration - do you agree?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internati ... r_Families
ISTM that protection of migrant workers and families is a good thing and not necessarily the same as advocating unrestricted migration - do you agree?