Latest post of the previous page:
Expert, pronounce "ex-spurt": a hasbeen drip under pressure.Alan H wrote:Pft. Experts? Who needs them...Gottard wrote:
Latest post of the previous page:
Expert, pronounce "ex-spurt": a hasbeen drip under pressure.Alan H wrote:Pft. Experts? Who needs them...Gottard wrote:
Dave B wrote:Expert, pronounce "ex-spurt": a drip under pressure.that has been ejectedAlan H wrote:Pft. Experts? Who needs them...Gottard wrote:
I might have not understood your comments; something wrong in their statements?Dave B wrote:Dave B wrote:Expert, pronounce "ex-spurt": a drip under pressure.that has been ejectedAlan H wrote: Pft. Experts? Who needs them...
You've obviously missed our PM candidate, Michael Gove:Gottard wrote:I might have not understood your comments; something wrong in their statements?Dave B wrote:Dave B wrote: Expert, pronounce "ex-spurt": a drip under pressure.that has been ejected
I think people in this country have had enough of experts.
you're right to chide me for my silly remark about "faith". But where are we? And so, to repeat, what it is that we are trying to make work (or not) and however would we do either?Tetenterre wrote:It's OK to disagree. And I suppose it's also OK to misrepresent the term "good faith" if it really means that much to you to do so. The point remains that over half of those who voted did so for something that I suspect none of us likes. But I'm not one of those who takes the Churchilian view of democracy, or who reckons that it's OK as long as it produces the results I want.
We are where we are and the alternative to trying to make it work is to not try to make it work. Exactly who does that serve other than those who would cut off their noses to spite their faces?
Let us hope that MP's pay careful attention to this compelling argument.
Please send help we are on fire.
I'm still optimistic that sense will prevail and Article 50 will never be triggered.Gottard wrote:http://wishingoneurope.blogactiv.eu/
not only may it be May, it seems pretty certain to be. And from what she says, it's not a question that she "may" take us out, since that is another certainty. Whether Parliament gets any meaningful say I doubt, though it has to repeal the 1972 Act. Also, the EU noises seem to be that we have to actually leave the EU before any negotiation starts on some alternative arrangement over trade and tariffs, so maybe Parliamentary repeal will be a formality to round off proceedings? Very strange. I'm waiting for a reply from my local MP, the strongly Europhile Nicholas Soames.Alan H wrote:
Theresa 'clueless' May who seems keen on the Big Brother approach to governing us and pushed through the Psychoactive Substances Act despite expert opinion it was unworkable. Seems to have been in favour of remaining in the EU, but may now want to take us out.
Not Gemma Arrowsmith :Alan H wrote:Pft. Experts? Who needs them...
Yup, drop us in it then duck the blow-back (they think).Alan H wrote:So Farage has fallen on his sword. Any more Brexit idiots to go?
All those who got us into this unnecessary fucking mess are beneath contempt.Dave B wrote:Yup, drop us in it then duck the blow-back (they think).Alan H wrote:So Farage has fallen on his sword. Any more Brexit idiots to go?
That goes for most politicians IMHOAlan H wrote:All those who got us into this unnecessary fucking mess are beneath contempt.Dave B wrote:Yup, drop us in it then duck the blow-back (they think).Alan H wrote:So Farage has fallen on his sword. Any more Brexit idiots to go?
Who might that be, Gottard? Go one, give us a clue, does the name start with E or G? No one else they would listennto.Gottard wrote:I have a suspect that all those chain resignations have been "asked" by someone high in the ladder that I don't personally know