tubataxidriver wrote:Past the first collapsing floor, the kinetic energy gained (remember the weight of the non-burning floors above the impact area) would be sufficient to overcome the strength of the connections between the steelwork sections and the whole thing comes down.
Have they shown this to be true through any equations / models? If so, has it been peer reviewed and accepted? Or is it an assumption that these scientists are working on.
Apart from buildings 1 and 2, what happened to 7? No mention of it in any reports of the government...this one too had come down almost in free fall speed. And if you remember the BBC newsreader, when she was reading out that WTC 7 had COLLAPSED, you could see the building standing through the window behind her. It went down only after around 10 minutes.
My larger point is this: the government told us that 9/11 incident had been perpetrated by 19 hijackers (a few of them apparently turned out alive). None of us know whether this is true. We don't even know if the government itself conspired. There is no credible evidence provided by the government for going after those 19 terrorists and OBL. Also, the government has not scientifically proven how exactly things unfolded. If they come out and say, "guys the thing is that we are not competent enough to know the physics of it, but we will work it out in time", that would be more appreciated than the government claiming to KNOW the exact sequence of things...because this is where their explanations are being debunked.
Does this mean government did 9/11, I don't know. But did the government use the 9/11 incident to further its objectives by whipping up mass hysteria? You bet they did, and are continuing to do it.
For every truther, you will find one debunker. The question is, who benefits from all this? Or rather who IS benefiting from all this?