INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
Introducing minecraft
Introducing minecraft
Hi everyone, I am the son of Compassionist. I am eight years old. I like asking questions and finding out answers.
-
- Posts: 3590
- Joined: July 14th, 2007, 8:38 am
Re: Introductions...
to the forum my son. Hope you find all the answers you are looking for.minecraft wrote:Hi everyone, I am the son of Compassionist. I am eight years old. I like asking questions and finding out answers.
Re: Introductions...
Hi minecraft and
Please feel free to ask whatever questions you like and we'll do our best to answer them as best we can!
Please feel free to ask whatever questions you like and we'll do our best to answer them as best we can!
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: Introductions...
Hello minecraft, you may be able to answer some of our questions as well, been an awful long time since I was eight!!!
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015
Me, 2015
Re: Introductions...
Hello Minecraft, and welcome to the forum
Re: Introductions...
Hi, Minecraft and welcome to the Forum. Ask away!
Carpe diem. Savour every moment.
Re: Introductions...
A big warm minecraft. We don't always have answers but we have a lot of fun thinking about questions
- draykorinee
- Posts: 245
- Joined: September 21st, 2013, 11:10 am
Re: Introductions...
Alright minecraft, welcome to the forums.
sanctimonious
ˌsaŋ(k)tɪˈməʊnɪəs/Submit
adjectivederogatory
1.
making a show of being morally superior to other people.
ˌsaŋ(k)tɪˈməʊnɪəs/Submit
adjectivederogatory
1.
making a show of being morally superior to other people.
Re: Introductions...
Hi Minecraft and DanRea!
Why did you choose your particular name, Minecraft?
Why did you choose your particular name, Minecraft?
"It's hard to put a leash on a dog once you've put a crown on his head"-Tyrion Lannister.
Re: Introductions...
Oh dear. Even an oldie like me knows the answer to that one!getreal wrote:Why did you choose your particular name, Minecraft?
Do you play much minecraft, minecraft?
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
- Tetenterre
- Posts: 3244
- Joined: March 13th, 2011, 11:36 am
Re: Introductions...
Hello & welcome, minecraft. Asking questions is the only way any of us truly advances. Please don't be disheartened if we don't have answers, only more questions.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Steve
Quantum Theory: The branch of science with which people who know absolutely sod all about quantum theory can explain anything.
Quantum Theory: The branch of science with which people who know absolutely sod all about quantum theory can explain anything.
Re: Introductions...
Thank you to everyone for the warm welcome. Minecraft is one of my favourite games. That's why I chose it as my username. I play it almost everyday on Xbox 360 and on PC. You can ask me questions if you like. I have a question. If you travelled faster than light would time go backwards?Alan H wrote:Oh dear. Even an oldie like me knows the answer to that one!getreal wrote:Why did you choose your particular name, Minecraft?
Do you play much minecraft, minecraft?
Re: Introductions...
What a good question, minecraft I don't know.
But as yet I don't think we know of anything that travels faster than light. I think we need someone who knows more about theoretical physics than me. And who can explain in an understandable way... any offers good people?
But as yet I don't think we know of anything that travels faster than light. I think we need someone who knows more about theoretical physics than me. And who can explain in an understandable way... any offers good people?
Re: Introductions...
We do know that if you travel at any speed, time moves more slowly for you. We don't notice this in our everyday lives because it only changes be a very, very, very, very, very small amount - far too small for us to be aware of. But time goes more slowly the faster you move and things like satellites that orbit the earth have to know this and adjust their clocks. But it's still a very small amount.minecraft wrote:I have a question. If you travelled faster than light would time go backwards?
Think about this: if you had a twin and one of you travelled out into space and went very, very fast to the nearest star and then came back to earth, your twin would be younger than you! How amazing is that? This was a 'thought experiment' that Albert Einstein did a hundred years ago. It was just a 'thought experiment' because it wasn't something he could do - they didn't even have spaceships then! But we still can't really do that because, although we have spaceships now, they can't go fast enough for the twin to be any younger that we would notice. But, the astronauts that have been up in the International Space Station flying around the earth are younger than they would have been if they had stayed on the earth! But they are younger by a tiny, tiny bit of a second, so no one will ever notice!
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: Introductions...
[Edit]
Alan you are not entirely clear as to which twin will be the older, it is the twin left behind that ages the more, the traveller will be the younger. The Twin Paradox. I do know that after a year of travelling at the speed of light you will still be a year older to yourself (and about 9 500 000 000 000 kilometers away!) The four hours between breakfast and lunch will still be, for you, four hours long and you will be just as hungry.
Good old Albert imagined looking at a clock face and moving away from it at the speed of light, you would always see the clock as it was at that time, say 12 noon, because you would be moving with a "slice" of time. So for you, the traveller, time in the rest of the Universe will have seemed to have come to a halt. Someone likened "space time" to a sausage, as wide and as high as the Universe as it expands and as long as time itself and getting longer with every instant.
What happens if you go faster than light? According to Albert's idea it seems you would catch up with earlier images of the clock, say at 11.59am. But have you travelled back through time? The only way that can be meaningful would be to be able to travel away from Earth at, say, a hundred times the speed of light for a year and then come back to see some event that happened back in time. It seems logical that this can happen but I have this horrible feeling that does not work that way.
Now, if you could go from standstill to faster than the speed of light immediately, travel in a circle to come back to Earth then instantly come to a stop . . . But this can only be another of those "thought experiments" until the scientists come up with a way to try it out for real. Don't hold your breath!
Can TT or anyone else expand on this?
Alan you are not entirely clear as to which twin will be the older, it is the twin left behind that ages the more, the traveller will be the younger. The Twin Paradox. I do know that after a year of travelling at the speed of light you will still be a year older to yourself (and about 9 500 000 000 000 kilometers away!) The four hours between breakfast and lunch will still be, for you, four hours long and you will be just as hungry.
Good old Albert imagined looking at a clock face and moving away from it at the speed of light, you would always see the clock as it was at that time, say 12 noon, because you would be moving with a "slice" of time. So for you, the traveller, time in the rest of the Universe will have seemed to have come to a halt. Someone likened "space time" to a sausage, as wide and as high as the Universe as it expands and as long as time itself and getting longer with every instant.
What happens if you go faster than light? According to Albert's idea it seems you would catch up with earlier images of the clock, say at 11.59am. But have you travelled back through time? The only way that can be meaningful would be to be able to travel away from Earth at, say, a hundred times the speed of light for a year and then come back to see some event that happened back in time. It seems logical that this can happen but I have this horrible feeling that does not work that way.
Now, if you could go from standstill to faster than the speed of light immediately, travel in a circle to come back to Earth then instantly come to a stop . . . But this can only be another of those "thought experiments" until the scientists come up with a way to try it out for real. Don't hold your breath!
Can TT or anyone else expand on this?
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015
Me, 2015
Re: Introductions...
Ah. Good point. It's the one who travelled that would be younger than the one who stayed on earth. But, as you say, for each of them, time would appear to pass at the same rate and neither of them would notice any difference. It's only when they meet again that they would notice the difference.Dave B wrote:Alan you are not entirely clear as to which twin will be the older, it is the twin left behind that ages the more, the traveller will be the younger.
I hope you don't have a twin, minecraft? Could your Dad cope with two of you?
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: Introductions...
Thank you to everyone who answered my question about travelling faster than light. Nope, I don't have a twin. Another question. Whats 40000000000000000 x 40000000000000000? Can you get it right without a calculator?Alan H wrote:Ah. Good point. It's the one who travelled that would be younger than the one who stayed on earth. But, as you say, for each of them, time would appear to pass at the same rate and neither of them would notice any difference. It's only when they meet again that they would notice the difference.Dave B wrote:Alan you are not entirely clear as to which twin will be the older, it is the twin left behind that ages the more, the traveller will be the younger.
I hope you don't have a twin, minecraft? Could your Dad cope with two of you?
Re: Introductions...
Because I play Minecraft.getreal wrote:Hi Minecraft and DanRea!
Why did you choose your particular name, Minecraft?
Re: Introductions...
40,000,000,000,000,000 x 40,000,000,000,000,000 = 4 x 10^16 x 4 x 10^16 = 16 x 10^32 = 1,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Am I correct?minecraft wrote:Another question. Whats 40000000000000000 x 40000000000000000? Can you get it right without a calculator?
When I said 40,000,000,000,000,000 = 4 x 10^16, I'm using a common shorthand way of saying big numbers. This means 4 followed by sixteen zeros and you say it as "4 times ten to the power 16". Don't worry about that if you don't know that, but it makes the sum a lot easier to do!
Also, can you see that I put commas after every three zeros? That just makes it easier to count how many zeros there are - it's too easy to get lost trying to count how many there are in 40000000000000000!
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
Re: Introductions...
You are right!Alan H wrote:40,000,000,000,000,000 x 40,000,000,000,000,000 = 4 x 10^16 x 4 x 10^16 = 16 x 10^32 = 1,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Am I correct?minecraft wrote:Another question. Whats 40000000000000000 x 40000000000000000? Can you get it right without a calculator?
When I said 40,000,000,000,000,000 = 4 x 10^16, I'm using a common shorthand way of saying big numbers. This means 4 followed by sixteen zeros and you say it as "4 times ten to the power 16". Don't worry about that if you don't know that, but it makes the sum a lot easier to do!
Also, can you see that I put commas after every three zeros? That just makes it easier to count how many zeros there are - it's too easy to get lost trying to count how many there are in 40000000000000000!