INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy. Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

Any topic related to science can be discussed here.
Message
Author
User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24047
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#61 Post by Alan H » January 19th, 2012, 10:48 am

Latest post of the previous page:

msbiljanica wrote:I made a mistake-
2+5=7 , 2+10=12 , 2+15=17, 2+20=22 , 2+25=27 , 2+30=32 , 2+35=37 , 2+38=40,
2+40=42, 2+41=43 , 2+44=46 , 2+45=47, 2+47=49 , 2+50=52 ,2+57=59 , 2+60=62 ,
2+64=66, 2+70=72, 2+71=73 , 2+78=80 , 2+80=82 , 2+85=87 , 2+90=92 ,2+92=94
srcko
5550={5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50}
38350={38,41,44,47,50}
501090={50,60,70,80,90}
50792={50,57,64,71,78,85,92}
_______________________________________________________________________--
2+10=12 , 2+15=17 , 2+16=18 , 2+20=22 , 2+23=25
2+25=27 , 2+29=31 , 2+30=32 , 2+35=37 , 2+37=39
2+38=40 , 2+40=42 , 2+44=46 , 2+45=47 , 2+47=49
2+50=52 , 2+51=53 , 2+55=57 , 2+56=58 , 2+58=60
2+60=62 , 2+64=66 , 2+65=67 , 2+70=72 , 2+71=73
2+74=76 , 2+75=77 , 2+80=82 , 2+82=84 , 2+83=85
2+92=94 , 2+101=103 -non-red range
srcko
10580={10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55,60,65,70,75,80}
16765={16,23,30,37,44,51,58,65}
299101={29,38,47,56,65,74,83,92,101}
Did you miss my request?
In words and sentences (no numbers or diagrams allowed) what is it you are trying to convince us of?
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

msbiljanica

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#62 Post by msbiljanica » January 19th, 2012, 2:09 pm

Alan H wrote:msbiljanica

In words and sentences (no numbers or diagrams allowed) what is it you are trying to convince us of?
that mathematics can be simple, it can solve more problems than the current mathematics, that mathematics is actually a large geometry (which is why I mentioned mathematical space, along a natural, realistic along, Definition of the point), that every new thing will not give you an axiom that things related, that's my reason to show you my math

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#63 Post by Dave B » January 19th, 2012, 2:16 pm

msbiljanica wrote:
Alan H wrote:msbiljanica

In words and sentences (no numbers or diagrams allowed) what is it you are trying to convince us of?
that mathematics can be simple, it can solve more problems than the current mathematics, that mathematics is actually a large geometry (which is why I mentioned mathematical space, along a natural, realistic along, Definition of the point), that every new thing will not give you an axiom that things related, that's my reason to show you my math
That does not describe your math - that is what we need, in the form you present it it is incomprehensible to us. This may be our lacking - please spell it out in simple words to humour us.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24047
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#64 Post by Alan H » January 19th, 2012, 6:06 pm

msbiljanica wrote:
Alan H wrote:msbiljanica

In words and sentences (no numbers or diagrams allowed) what is it you are trying to convince us of?
that mathematics can be simple, it can solve more problems than the current mathematics, that mathematics is actually a large geometry (which is why I mentioned mathematical space, along a natural, realistic along, Definition of the point), that every new thing will not give you an axiom that things related, that's my reason to show you my math
How much 'conventional' mathematics do you know? Set theory? Topology? Vector analysis? Tensor theory?
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

msbiljanica

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#65 Post by msbiljanica » January 27th, 2012, 2:54 pm

PDF - http://www.mediafire.com/?mm3e9fb73g494sp
____________________________________________-
Presupposition-Srcko can join a number not that can not be in the structure srcko
Process:
P1 101070 and 5 , 5_101070
P2 5520 and 22 ,5520_22
P3 75 and 25 , 75_25
P4 68 and 2 ,2_68
...
General form -abc_d , d_abc , ab_d ,d_ab...
[S15]-pendant srcko
CM-[S15]-does no know
Note-only one number can be pendand , number two goes into a complex srcko
__________________________________________________________
Presupposition-Two ( more ) srcko (pendand srcko) are combined into one unit
Process:
P1 106 and 118 , 106118
P2 10565 and 703,10565_703
P3 30360 and 45277_78 ,30360_45277_78
...
General form -abcd, abc_de ,abc_def_g ,...
[S16]-two ( more) srcko
CM-[S16]-does no know

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#66 Post by Dave B » January 27th, 2012, 3:30 pm

AAAAAgh!

Sound of forum member deciding to end it all.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

msbiljanica

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#67 Post by msbiljanica » January 28th, 2012, 10:10 am

Presupposition-Two ( more ) srcko have the first ( last) common number
Process:
P1 10530 and 3330 , 10533(_30)
P2 4444 and 441094 and 44256 , 44(_44_)1094256
...
General form -abcd(_e) , ab(_c_)defg , ...
[S17]-two ( more) first-last srcko
CM-[S17]-does no know
______________________________________________________
Presupposition-In the expression a+(.b)c=d , d+(s.0)11 or d+(s.0)number (more) from 11
Process:
P1 3+(.s.0)5=8+(s.0)11, 3+(s.0)5<91
P2 5+(.0)5=5+(s.0)224 , 5+(.0)5<729
...
General form - a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)11 ,a+(s.b)c<e1
a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)e , a+(.b)c<f
a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)efg , a+(.b)c<hij ...
[S18]-left inequality
CM-[S18]-know
_______________________________________
2+5=7 , 2+10=12 , 2+15=17, 2+20=22 , 2+25=27 , 2+30=32 , 2+35=37 , 2+38=40,
2+40=42, 2+41=43 , 2+44=46 , 2+45=47, 2+47=49 , 2+50=52 ,2+57=59 , 2+60=62 ,
2+64=66, 2+70=72, 2+71=73 , 2+78=80 , 2+80=82 , 2+85=87 , 2+90=92 ,2+92=94
srcko
5550={5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50}
38350={38,41,44,47,50}
501090={50,60,70,80,90}
50792={50,57,64,71,78,85,92}
two(more) first-last srcko
55383(_50_)1090792
remains part of the function, when we come to it

msbiljanica

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#68 Post by msbiljanica » January 29th, 2012, 8:53 am

Presupposition-Parts number (a) and mobile number (b ) have a contact , the contact is delete
Process:
P1 4-(.0)2=2
P2 4-(.1)2=¤1(2)1¤ image
P3 4-(.2)2=2
P4 4-(.3)2=¤3(1)1¤
P5 4-(.4)2=¤4(0)2¤
a12.png
a12.png (40.76 KiB) Viewed 1266 times
General form
a-(.0)b=c
a-(.1)b=c
...
a-(.d)b=c
[S19]-subtraction
CM-only form a-(s.0/s.0)b=c , others do not know , axiom
_______________________________________________________________________
Presupposition-In the expression a+(.b)c=d , d-(s.0/s.0))11f or d-(s.0/s.0))number (more) from 11f
Process:
P1 3+(.s.0)5=8-(s.0/s.0))118 , 3+(s.0)5>017
P2 5+(.0)5=5-(s.0/s.0))224 , 5+(.0)5>321
...
General form - a+(.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0))11f ,a+(s.b)c>01e
a+(.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0)e , a+(.b)c>f
a+(.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0)efg , a+(.b)c>hij ...
[S20]-right inequality addition
CM-[S20]-know

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24047
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#69 Post by Alan H » January 29th, 2012, 11:36 am

I have warned msbiljanica on two occasions that he needed to engage with the others here and answer the fundamental questions being asked.

The final deadline to do so has just passed without any such engagement. Instead, we got a repetition of the same incongruous and undecipherable nonsense. I appreciate there is an obvious language difficulty, but we were making no progress whatsoever.

He is therefore now banned from posting again.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
jaywhat
Posts: 15807
Joined: July 5th, 2007, 5:53 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#70 Post by jaywhat » January 29th, 2012, 1:57 pm

Shit! I shall have to be careful - don't want to be too clever here ! :hilarity:

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24047
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#71 Post by Alan H » March 31st, 2012, 5:03 pm

Waste 10 minutes of your time watching this utter drivel: Vortex-Based Mathematics. This is a TED conference. How they let their standards slip...
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#72 Post by Dave B » March 31st, 2012, 5:31 pm

As you said, Alan, what has happened to their standards?

I wanted to see him put that magnet in a bowl down somewhere else and see if it still moved. It looked awfully like same technique the fakers use with "pendulums" to test for the gender of a child or whatever, very small hand movements, shoving or tipping, can make a mass move quite a lot.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

Post Reply