INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy. Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

Unbelievable - Singh case

Any topic related to science can be discussed here.
Post Reply
Message
Author
jdc
Posts: 516
Joined: January 27th, 2009, 9:03 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#281 Post by jdc » July 12th, 2010, 8:41 pm

Latest post of the previous page:

grammar king wrote:That's worrying Alan. The GC are clearly not going as far as their remit requires.
Didn't someone once try to find out who to complain to about the GCC?

Alan H?
My Blog; Twitter.
Email: 325jdc325 (at) googlemail.com

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#282 Post by Alan H » July 13th, 2010, 8:45 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#283 Post by Alan H » July 31st, 2010, 6:28 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
grammar king
Posts: 869
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 2:42 am

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#284 Post by grammar king » August 9th, 2010, 12:19 pm

Whilst we're on the topic of legal challenges to woo, anyone near Edinburgh may be interested that Simon Singh will be speaking tonight at 6pm at the Banshee Labyrinth on Niddry Street. It's all part of the Edinburgh Skeptics' Fringe of Reason event which is happening every day, same time and place throughout the festival, including such other speakers as Richard Wiseman, Matt Parker, Caroline Watt, Chris French, and me (yesterday, so you missed out on that).

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#285 Post by Dave B » August 9th, 2010, 12:41 pm

the Banshee Labyrinth on Niddry Street.
Almost sounds like Edinburgh has opened a portal into Harry Potterland!

Edit: just thought, since it is the right season is this series of talks a ploy to prevent the Lunatic Fringe getting a hold on the city?
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#286 Post by Alan H » August 24th, 2010, 9:31 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#287 Post by Alan H » September 17th, 2010, 12:41 am

Time for another one!

Blogging: Zeno's Blog » Getting their nappies in a twist
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan C.
Posts: 10356
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 3:35 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#288 Post by Alan C. » September 17th, 2010, 7:22 pm

Another good blog post A H.
I have recently fallen out with the ASA,
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned this yet; so I will.
Pregnant nun ice cream advert banned for 'mockery'
Sub titled by the NSS as "Advertising watchdog reintroduces blasphemy law" :angry:
Abstinence Makes the Church Grow Fondlers.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#289 Post by Alan H » November 10th, 2010, 2:41 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#290 Post by Alan H » November 19th, 2010, 9:03 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan C.
Posts: 10356
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 3:35 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#291 Post by Alan C. » November 19th, 2010, 10:25 pm

Excellent as always Alan but a typo about 2/3ds the way down?
Acute Lower Pack Pain
Abstinence Makes the Church Grow Fondlers.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#292 Post by Alan H » November 19th, 2010, 10:47 pm

Bugger! Now fixed - thanks Alan!
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#293 Post by Dave B » November 19th, 2010, 11:07 pm

Alan C. wrote:Excellent as always Alan but a typo about 2/3ds the way down?
Acute Lower Pack Pain
Leave the slings of a heavy rucksack far too loose and that is exactly what you get! :D

Night, night . . . zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#294 Post by Alan H » November 19th, 2010, 11:14 pm

:laughter:
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan C.
Posts: 10356
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 3:35 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#295 Post by Alan C. » November 19th, 2010, 11:30 pm

Alan H
Bugger! Now fixed - thanks Alan!
Where would we be without pedants and proofreaders? :rolleyes:

Sorry, couldn't quite get the right words, so deleted the rest of this post.
Abstinence Makes the Church Grow Fondlers.

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#296 Post by Dave B » November 20th, 2010, 9:25 am

Alan C. wrote:
Alan H
Bugger! Now fixed - thanks Alan!
Where would we be without pedants and proofreaders? :rolleyes:
Probab;y tupong ans pibloshung a lad ov rubber?
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#297 Post by Alan H » December 14th, 2010, 10:48 pm

This is the big one!

Blogging: Zeno's Blog » Humpty Dumpty regulation
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#298 Post by Alan H » April 8th, 2011, 4:23 pm

Blogging: Zeno's Blog » Out with the old… http://www.zenosblog.com/2011/04/out-with-the-old…/
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#299 Post by Dave B » April 8th, 2011, 4:26 pm

Ooops, pressed the wrong button whilst trying to find out why your link did not link, Alan. Wiped that out.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#300 Post by Alan H » April 8th, 2011, 4:37 pm

Dave B wrote:Ooops, pressed the wrong button whilst trying to find out why your link did not link, Alan. Wiped that out.
Very odd - I have no idea why it didn't like that. Bad Science forum gives me the same issue. Perhaps it's because the URL has an ellipsis in it. Anyway, I've changed it.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: Unbelievable - Singh case

#301 Post by Dave B » April 8th, 2011, 5:23 pm

Fanks.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

Post Reply