INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy. Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

The Natural World

Any topic related to science can be discussed here.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24062
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#601 Post by Alan H » November 28th, 2015, 1:14 am

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24062
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#602 Post by Alan H » January 11th, 2016, 11:13 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24062
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#603 Post by Alan H » October 22nd, 2016, 8:39 am

Some fantastic photos in the Comedy Wildlife Photo Awards 2016.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

yash
Posts: 1
Joined: November 11th, 2016, 6:25 am

Re: The Natural World

#604 Post by yash » November 12th, 2016, 7:15 am

The world is great with the present of nature. But we are polluting them.

By the way good work.

Today I introduce a website which explains you the science in every work in our daily life.

http://howwhywhat.net - How Why What - Learn science in our daily life

This How Why What is a science daily website where you can learn the science & technology hidden in our daily life. The science lies in every work in our daily life, we are going to explain to you that amazing hidden science in our daily works.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24062
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#605 Post by Alan H » November 20th, 2016, 12:12 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24062
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#606 Post by Alan H » December 5th, 2016, 10:38 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24062
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#607 Post by Alan H » February 15th, 2017, 4:06 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24062
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#608 Post by Alan H » February 24th, 2017, 10:40 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24062
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#609 Post by Alan H » June 5th, 2017, 9:49 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Tetenterre
Posts: 3244
Joined: March 13th, 2011, 11:36 am

Re: The Natural World

#610 Post by Tetenterre » January 6th, 2018, 1:26 pm

As far as I can ascertain, this bit of pareidolia is genuine. Photographed by Daniel Biber from Hilzingen, Germany.
Starling_bird.jpg
Starling_bird.jpg (31.81 KiB) Viewed 2276 times
Steve

Quantum Theory: The branch of science with which people who know absolutely sod all about quantum theory can explain anything.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24062
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#611 Post by Alan H » January 6th, 2018, 1:58 pm

Tetenterre wrote:As far as I can ascertain, this bit of pareidolia is genuine. Photographed by Daniel Biber from Hilzingen, Germany.
Starling_bird.jpg
Lovely!
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24062
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#612 Post by Alan H » February 28th, 2018, 12:23 am

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

Post Reply