INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy. Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

Search found 387 matches

by Pahu
May 18th, 2016, 6:55 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Moon Recession As tidal friction gradually slows Earth’s spin, the laws of physics require the Moon to recede from Earth. (Edmond Halley first detected this recession in 1695.) Even if the Moon began orbiting near Earth’s surface, the Moon should have moved to its present distance from Earth in bil...
by Pahu
May 11th, 2016, 2:29 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Rapid Cooling If the Earth began in a molten state, it would have cooled to its present condition in much less than 4.5 billion years. This conclusion holds even if one makes liberal assumptions for the amount of heat generated by radioactive decay within Earth. The known temperature pattern inside...
by Pahu
May 6th, 2016, 9:38 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

I see no proof, I see only belif and faith, no facts, no concrete evidence. The only evidence is that your god, granting for one fleeting moment its existence, is indiferent to the fate of mankind and his own "creation". Oh, should have mentioned that your god seems to allow innocent, even good, pe...
by Pahu
May 6th, 2016, 6:26 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Since it has been proven that the Bible is the Word of God, it is true, reliable and infallible. I see no proof, I see only belif and faith, no facts, no concrete evidence. The only evidence is that your god, granting for one fleeting moment its existence, is indiferent to the fate of mankind and h...
by Pahu
May 6th, 2016, 1:32 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

" hi Pahu, that is interesting, but the link you quote is just a publisher blurb, so I have to ask whether you have actually read this book; if you have, please give us a taster of it. I did provide a taste of it and yes, I have read it. You can read the book online here: https://books.google.com/b...
by Pahu
May 6th, 2016, 1:16 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Pahu, you are preaching, prosetylising, evangelising or whatever in the wrong place. This is a Humanist forum where we are happy to debate . Dunno about the others but, for me, debate means putting up a subject, idea or proposition that the other can read, consider and respond to. And then the proc...
by Pahu
May 5th, 2016, 6:23 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Pahu, you are preaching, prosetylising, evangelising or whatever in the wrong place. This is a Humanist forum where we are happy to debate . Dunno about the others but, for me, debate means putting up a subject, idea or proposition that the other can read, consider and respond to. And then the proc...
by Pahu
May 5th, 2016, 2:02 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

But you digress yet again... what about dealing fully and properly with the first issue you brought up then we can maybe move on to other areas of discussion? What have I lacked that did not deal fully and properly with the first issue I brought up? I've mentioned twice now the two questions (but t...
by Pahu
May 4th, 2016, 9:37 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Meteoritic Dust [/b] Meteoritic dust is accumulating on Earth so fast that, after 4 billion years (at today’s low and diminishing rate), the equivalent of more than 16 feet of this dust should have accumulated.  Because this dust is high in nickel, Earth’s crust should have abundant nickel. No such...
by Pahu
May 4th, 2016, 9:33 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

delete
by Pahu
May 4th, 2016, 3:32 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Meteoritic Dust [/b] Meteoritic dust is accumulating on Earth so fast that, after 4 billion years (at today’s low and diminishing rate), the equivalent of more than 16 feet of this dust should have accumulated.  Because this dust is high in nickel, Earth’s crust should have abundant nickel. No such...
by Pahu
May 1st, 2016, 8:21 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Some people do remember their pasts lives. In the book, Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation by Ian Stevenson, his team of scientists interviewed twenty children who remembered their past lives. Their accounts were checked as to past life relatives, places, events, etc. and were found to be acc...
by Pahu
April 29th, 2016, 7:11 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

What does that mean? The universe cannot be infinitely old or all useable energy would have been lost already (entropy). This has not occurred. Therefore, the universe is not infinitely old. Therefore, the universe had a beginning and before that beginning there was nothing. Something cannot come f...
by Pahu
April 29th, 2016, 6:52 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

If the universe had no beginning, then it is eternal, which violates science. What does that mean? The universe cannot be infinitely old or all useable energy would have been lost already (entropy). This has not occurred. Therefore, the universe is not infinitely old. Therefore, the universe had a ...
by Pahu
April 29th, 2016, 3:13 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

I have only checked out the second of these links. But have you actually read it yourself? It in fact debunks this attempt to prove the scientific accuracy of the Bible. Yes, I have read it myself. Where does it debunk this attempt to prove the scientific accuracy of the Bible? ok, here is the conc...
by Pahu
April 29th, 2016, 2:36 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

it is not "a fact" that the universe simply came into being from nothing, therefore your argument is not valid Do you deny that before the universe existed there was nothing? no, more that we don't actually know whether the universe had a beginning. If there have been cycles of Big Bangs then the q...
by Pahu
April 27th, 2016, 4:45 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Moon Dust and Debris If the Moon were billions of years old, it should have accumulated a thick layer of dust and debris from meteoritic bombardment. Before instruments were placed on the Moon, some scientists were very concerned that astronauts would sink into a sea of dust—possibly a mile in thic...
by Pahu
April 27th, 2016, 2:48 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

That is what God has revealed. Is His Bible reliable? Here are some facts: 2. The Bible is not a science book, yet is scientifically accurate: http://www.inplainsite.org/html/scientific_facts_in_the_bible.html http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Science_Confirms_the_Bible http://www.eternal-productions.or...
by Pahu
April 27th, 2016, 2:41 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Where is that evidence? Here are some facts: Before the universe existed there was nothing from which it appeared, which is impossible by any natural cause. Therefor the cause of the universe was supernatural, proving the existence of God. it is not "a fact" that the universe simply came into being...
by Pahu
April 26th, 2016, 2:14 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Pahu wrote: No one has died yet. When our bodies die, we continue to live and reincarnate into another body. Alan responded: That'll come as a bit of a shock to my Mum! Any idea where she is? Er, "Who" might also be pertinent . . . Any idea of all the "who"s I have been over the history of man then...