INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy. Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

Search found 387 matches

by Pahu
June 6th, 2016, 1:08 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

With regsrds to quotations (or, very often, mis- or out-of-context quotations) the final paaragraph of the above link is applicable: Another correspondent on TALK.ORIGINS, Alan Filipski, added, "The validity of the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection does not depend on a quote by anyone, Nobel...
by Pahu
June 5th, 2016, 8:32 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Pahu, creation "science" is not reliable, independent, supporting evidence for creation "science". Find something from a reputable, not religion based or funded, university or research organisation, with an author who is not a creationist, and I might bother to read it. What is wrong with the scien...
by Pahu
June 5th, 2016, 2:38 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Pahu, creation "science" is not reliable, independent, supporting evidence for creation "science". Find something from a reputable, not religion based or funded, university or research organisation, with an author who is not a creationist, and I might bother to read it. What is wrong with the scien...
by Pahu
June 5th, 2016, 2:00 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

And I am still awaiting an explanation as to how lead and helium are products of a stable, non-radioactive compound that contains neither of them. When there us radioactive decay the final products can be lighter elements. So, with decay Helium might be such a product but a heavier product, lead wi...
by Pahu
June 4th, 2016, 1:22 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

I virtually left this thread when it became clear that Pahu is incapable of understanding rationalist blogs which actually rebut his/her beliefs. When was my information rebutted? In the rationalwiki page that you mistakenly thought supported you, when it actually did the opposite and disagreed wit...
by Pahu
June 3rd, 2016, 3:55 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Steve (Tetenterre), could you maybe please refresh me on all this stuff about comets - ie why it is relevant to whether science disproves evolution? The discussion of comets shows they originated from Earth a few thousand years ago, which disproves evolution. You will find the facts here: http://ww...
by Pahu
June 2nd, 2016, 6:11 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Pahu, you wrote: There is no evidence for a distant shell of cometary material surrounding the solar system, That is simply not true. The orbits of non-periodic comets suggests that they come from an extremely long distance away. (If you meant to say "there is no direct observational evidence" that...
by Pahu
June 1st, 2016, 2:24 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Young Comets As comets pass near the Sun, some of their mass vaporizes, producing a long tail and other debris (a). Comets also fragment frequently or crash into the Sun (b) or planets. Typical comets should disintegrate after several hundred orbits. For many comets this is less than 10,000 years. ...
by Pahu
May 26th, 2016, 3:47 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

You really need me to show you? Here are some: Post #1: Sexual Reproduction Post #29: Moon Dust and Debris Post #46: Meteoritic Dust Post #76: Rapid Cooling Post #82: Moon Recession Post #96: Young Age for the Moon and Earth Post #156: Hot Moon What would you like to continue to discuss about those...
by Pahu
May 26th, 2016, 2:55 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Pahu Can you please try to fully discuss one topic before jumping on to another? Or are you not interested in being questioned and providing cogent answers? For example? You really need me to show you? Here are some: Post #1: Sexual Reproduction Post #29: Moon Dust and Debris Post #46: Meteoritic D...
by Pahu
May 25th, 2016, 9:53 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Are you saying that only atheists are able to learn the truth? Nothing I said implied this. Another thing occurred to me. As the helium atom is rising through the atmosphere, assuming it is not slowed by bumping into other atoms, it would be rising at about the same speed as a helium filled balloon...
by Pahu
May 25th, 2016, 9:52 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Alan H wrote:Pahu

Can you please try to fully discuss one topic before jumping on to another? Or are you not interested in being questioned and providing cogent answers?
For example?
by Pahu
May 25th, 2016, 9:41 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Pahu, there seems absolutely no point here, on an atheist/humanist forum, in offering one creationalist site as an explanation of the failings of another creationalist site. Should you offer me an article from a reputable journal or well respected popular science book (by a reputable scientist) tha...
by Pahu
May 25th, 2016, 8:45 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Well, here's some stuff on helium in Earth's atmosphere, one of tbe claimed indicators of a young earth From Creation Science 71. Helium One product of radioactive decay within rocks is helium, a light gas. This helium enters the atmosphere at a much faster rate than helium escapes the atmosphere. ...
by Pahu
May 25th, 2016, 7:49 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Dave B wrote:
Actually, most dating techniques indicate that the Earth and solar system are young—possibly less than 10,000 years old.
WOW!

Now, show a scientific proof of that and I might be converted :D
Review my past posts.
by Pahu
May 25th, 2016, 7:11 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

[center] Hot Moon [/center] A surprising amount of heat is flowing out of the Moon from just below its surface, and yet the Moon’s interior is relatively cold (a). Because it has not yet cooled off, the Moon is much younger than most people had guessed, or relatively recent events have altered the ...
by Pahu
May 25th, 2016, 3:44 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

"Big Bang" was a singularity, not the result of anything. And as it has occurred, then it is indeed possible. Do you know of anything that was not caused by something? How about the Singularity? Nope, that was an effect of something. The universal law of cause and effect states that for every effec...
by Pahu
May 24th, 2016, 9:03 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Before the universe existed there was nothing from which it appeared, which is impossible by any natural cause. Therefor[e] the cause of the universe was supernatural, proving the existence of God. Well, what are we to make of this? According to the current hypotheses, (which, I admit, are difficul...
by Pahu
May 24th, 2016, 7:21 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Before the universe existed there was nothing from which it appeared, which is impossible by any natural cause. Therefor the cause of the universe was supernatural, proving the existence of God. Unproven assumption (or appeal to personal incredulity) and two non-sequiturs. Can you improve on that? ...
by Pahu
May 24th, 2016, 7:19 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159700

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

No one with the ability to think accepts the scientifically disproved hypothesis of evolution. [my bold] Oh! When was it demoted from a theory then, Pahu? Does your belief in your supernatural entity qualify you to decide such? So, according to you, a person who believes in things that have no abso...