INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy. Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

Search found 387 matches

by Pahu
July 28th, 2016, 7:04 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Pahu, still curious as to why you have ignored my invitation here to discuss the Bell & McDairmid paper before moving on. (Clue: C&P-ing some long since superseded stuff on redshift does not constitute "discussion of the Bell & McDairmid paper") That subject is beyond my understanding. But, Pahu, "...
by Pahu
July 28th, 2016, 3:46 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Tetenterre wrote:Pahu, still curious as to why you have ignored my invitation here to discuss the Bell & McDairmid paper before moving on.

(Clue: C&P-ing some long since superseded stuff on redshift does not constitute "discussion of the Bell & McDairmid paper")
That subject is beyond my understanding.
by Pahu
July 26th, 2016, 2:38 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

[size=10pt] Galaxy Clusters Hundreds of rapidly moving galaxies often cluster tightly together. Their relative velocities, as inferred by the redshifts of their light, are so high that these clusters should be flying apart, because each cluster’s visible mass is much too small to hold its galaxies t...
by Pahu
July 19th, 2016, 2:06 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Unstable Galaxies Computer simulations of the motions of spiral galaxies show them to be highly unstable; they should completely change their shape in only a small fraction of the universe’s assumed evolutionary age (a). The simplest explanation for so many spiral galaxies, including our Milky Way ...
by Pahu
July 14th, 2016, 8:25 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Here is something you may find interesting: [center]REAL OR FAKE? GHOSTLY PHOTO MESMERIZES SOCIAL MEDIA[/center][/color] Deadly motorcycle scene shows eerie figure: 'That is freaky' Published: 2 hours ago http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/07/ghost.png Real or fake? That’s the big question surrounding t...
by Pahu
July 13th, 2016, 3:49 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

As usual, you cite very old, long-since superseded, sources. (Also, clue: the word "appear" in "appear connected".) In 1971, I was an avid reader Halton Arp, Fred Hoyle, etc; 45 years ago, there was a possibility that they may be onto something; Quasars, Redshifts, and Controversies was a well-tumb...
by Pahu
July 12th, 2016, 3:01 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Connected Galaxies Galaxies frequently appear connected or aligned with other galaxies or quasars that have vastly different redshifts. This happens too often for all examples to be coincidences (a). If redshifts imply velocities (which is most likely), these galaxies and quasars haven’t been movin...
by Pahu
July 7th, 2016, 7:55 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Therefore, most people today almost instinctively believe that the Earth and universe are billions of years old. Sometimes, these people are disturbed, at least initially, when they see the evidence. What you call "evidence", rational people call "bullshit derived from carefully cherry-picked data"...
by Pahu
July 6th, 2016, 9:43 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Supernova Remnants In galaxies similar to our Milky Way Galaxy, a star will explode violently every 26 years or so (a). These explosions, called supernovas, produce gas and dust that expand outward thousands of miles per second. With radio telescopes, these remnants in our galaxy should be visible ...
by Pahu
July 2nd, 2016, 5:51 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Poynting-Robertson Effect Dust particles larger than about a 100,000th of a centimeter in diameter form a large disk-shaped cloud that orbits the Sun between the orbits of Venus and the asteroid belt. This cloud produces zodiacal light (a). Forces acting on these particles should spiral most of the...
by Pahu
June 29th, 2016, 3:03 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Poynting-Robertson Effect Dust particles larger than about a 100,000th of a centimeter in diameter form a large disk-shaped cloud that orbits the Sun between the orbits of Venus and the asteroid belt. This cloud produces zodiacal light (a). Forces acting on these particles should spiral most of the...
by Pahu
June 22nd, 2016, 4:40 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Solar Wind The Sun’s radiation applies an outward force on particles orbiting the Sun. Particles less than about a 100,000th of a centimeter in diameter should have been “blown out” of the solar system if it were billions of years old. Yet these particles are still orbiting the Sun. (a) Conclusion:...
by Pahu
June 19th, 2016, 2:21 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Thanks for a great link, milord, just confirms all I tried to say. Thought the comments were illuminating as well, especially the first, indicates that there are YECies with working, fairly objective, brains. rspeir said... Well, I am YEC, and I must admit this is certainly embarrassing. I have bee...
by Pahu
June 18th, 2016, 5:34 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Well, it seems acceoted that there are potential errors, mainly due to the migration of the products from the site of origin mucking up the ratios. I do notice that this is, undeestandably, a very, very popular subject with YECies. Since the prime question is the reliahility the rest of you post is...
by Pahu
June 18th, 2016, 4:58 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Part the second: That definition comes with this lovely diagram: The_Scientific_Method_as_an_Ongoing_Process.svg.png [It worked that time but I have still lost half my original lext :angry: Now, where was I . . . ? Oh, can't see what Pahu asked now] Any true scientist may wirk from a hunch or an ob...
by Pahu
June 18th, 2016, 2:53 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

The usual creationist ploy, Pahu, cherry picking, taking quotations out of context and quoting the opinion of biased and prejudiced people as fact and authority. Where do the quotes change the meaning of the contexts? Creation pseudo-scientists are anything but independent, their sole aim is to pro...
by Pahu
June 15th, 2016, 3:06 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Hot Planets Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune each radiate away more than twice the heat energy they receive from the Sun (a). Uranus (b) and Venus (c) also radiate too much heat. Calculations show that it is very unlikely that this energy comes from nuclear fusion (d), radioactive decay, gravitational ...
by Pahu
June 8th, 2016, 2:52 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Small Comets Photographs taken from Earth-orbiting satellites show small, ice-filled comets striking Earth’s upper atmosphere at an average rate of one every three seconds (a). http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/webpictures/astrophysicalsciences-small_comets.jpg Figure 33: Small Comets. The ...
by Pahu
June 6th, 2016, 6:51 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Headline news: Pope denies God's divinity! It says so on this religious news website. Just as valid a use of a quotation as some of those on your linked site,, Pahu :wink: Here is the complete quote: “God is not a divine being or a magician, but the Creator who brought everything to life,” Pope Fra...
by Pahu
June 6th, 2016, 1:22 pm
Forum: Sciences and pseudo-science
Topic: Science Disproves Evolution
Replies: 1008
Views: 159707

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

Headline news: Pope denies God's divinity! "God is not a divine being..." Pope Francis It says so on this religious news website. Just as valid a use of a quotation as some of those on your linked site,, Pahu :wink: Here is the complete quote: “God is not a divine being or a magician, but the Creat...