INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.

For further information, see our Privacy Policy.

Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

We are not accepting any new registrations.

SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

Any topic related to science can be discussed here.
Message
Author
User avatar
getreal
Posts: 4354
Joined: November 20th, 2008, 5:40 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#21 Post by getreal » November 20th, 2011, 3:23 pm

Latest post of the previous page:

*Well, even I (dim as I am) know that this is incorrect

a) 7 +7 = 3
b) 4 +4 = 15


* not sure what term to use. Facetiousness? Sarcasm? Irony, even?

answers on a postcard etc.
"It's hard to put a leash on a dog once you've put a crown on his head"-Tyrion Lannister.

thundril
Posts: 3607
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 5:02 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#22 Post by thundril » November 20th, 2011, 4:02 pm

Mornington Crescent!

thundril
Posts: 3607
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 5:02 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#23 Post by thundril » November 20th, 2011, 4:04 pm

getreal wrote:*Well, even I (dim as I am) know that this is incorrect

a) 7 +7 = 3
b) 4 +4 = 15


* not sure what term to use. Facetiousness? Sarcasm? Irony, even?

answers on a postcard etc.

7+7=3 modulo 11
4X4=15 in base 9
For the 2nd problem, I replaced a + with a X , which is valid under these rules.

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#24 Post by Dave B » November 20th, 2011, 5:04 pm

Gotcha on:

7+7=3 modulo 11

thundril (after I had looked up what "modulo" meant!)

I assume that the change in the second problem indicates your opinion that we are allowed to make up our own rules?
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

thundril
Posts: 3607
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 5:02 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#25 Post by thundril » November 20th, 2011, 5:07 pm

Very nearly, Dave B.
You are allowed to try to make up new rules as you go. I am allowed to tell you whether these rules are any good.

Baker Street.

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#26 Post by Dave B » November 20th, 2011, 6:10 pm

Whilst looking up "mudulo" this led me to "ring theory" which nearly led me to a nervous breakdown.

Montague Place
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

Fia
Posts: 5480
Joined: July 6th, 2007, 8:29 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#27 Post by Fia » November 20th, 2011, 9:28 pm

I love TH :D Only here the proper response to mathspam is Mornington Crescent.




Seven Sisters

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#28 Post by Dave B » November 20th, 2011, 9:53 pm

Hey, Fia, you worked a flanker there and changed from Montague Place to Montague Road! And then hopped over Monument Way! Still, there appears to be a cocktail bar called "Happiness" there, sounds good. Fancy a drink?

Later: Oops, misread the symbol - fancy a Chinese instead? Thought it was a cocktail shaker & glass - should have noticed the lack of an umbrella!
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

Nick
Posts: 11027
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 10:10 am

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#29 Post by Nick » November 21st, 2011, 5:00 pm

Errr... Dave! Haven't you realised we are playing the SRDANOVA Rules?

You should have challenged Fia. It should be Six Sisters! :headbang: Fancy missing the opportunity to put three points on her licence! :sad2:

Eight Elms......

thundril
Posts: 3607
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 5:02 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#30 Post by thundril » November 21st, 2011, 5:31 pm

There are 101 kinds of people in this world. . . . Those who understand binary, those who dont, and 11 undecided.
Cockfosters to you too, Nick!

User avatar
Val
Posts: 749
Joined: October 6th, 2007, 10:56 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#31 Post by Val » November 21st, 2011, 6:41 pm

now Thundril, lets not get too personal. Sorry, I thought you said Cock Festers.

msbiljanica

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#32 Post by msbiljanica » November 22nd, 2011, 4:11 pm

Presupposition-point numbers have opposite
The process:
P1-0 = (s.0)
P2-1 = (s.0, 1)
P3-2 = (s.0, 1.2)
P4-3 = (s.0, 1,2,3)
P5-4 = (s.0, 1,2,3,4)
...
ss-6.png
ss-6.png (28.32 KiB) Viewed 1706 times
[S7]-opposite point of
SM-I do not know the opposite point of
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presupposition-numbers are comparable with each other
The process:
P1-two numbers (a, b) are comparable with each other - a> b, a = b, a <b, ).(=(>,=,<)
P2-three numbers (a, b, c) are comparable with each other
ss-7.png
ss-7.png (15.07 KiB) Viewed 1706 times
P3-four numbers (a, b, c, d) are comparable with each other
ss-7a.png
ss-7a.png (85.87 KiB) Viewed 1708 times
...
[S8]-comparability issues
SM-known two of comparability, comparability of three numbers (a number comparable with the number of the PC),comparability of the other knows.

thundril
Posts: 3607
Joined: July 4th, 2008, 5:02 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#33 Post by thundril » November 22nd, 2011, 4:45 pm

Interesting that D is always incomparable in at least one direction!

The Ovals

jdc
Posts: 516
Joined: January 27th, 2009, 9:03 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#34 Post by jdc » November 22nd, 2011, 5:38 pm

Fia wrote:I love TH :D Only here the proper response to mathspam is Mornington Crescent.




Seven Sisters
It's a common response to perceived trolling on the Bad Science forum.

(I'd join in the game, but I'm afraid I'm stuck in Nidd.)
My Blog; Twitter.
Email: 325jdc325 (at) googlemail.com

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#35 Post by Dave B » November 22nd, 2011, 5:52 pm

Are we absolutely sure that there is no merit whatsoever in this stuff? I certainly am not qualified to read and understand maths beyond basic school maths and certain technical formulae that I have learned by rote.

I did not believe that there could be more than four dimensions. I asked mathematician type acquaintance about it and he tried to show me in maths - I just went cross eyed! There are no words adequate to describe some things.

Could any of us recognise good maths from bad above a certain level? Took some time for Einstein's work to be understood because he invented his own mathematical system to explain it - nothing existing at the time could do so.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

Nick
Posts: 11027
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 10:10 am

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#36 Post by Nick » November 22nd, 2011, 6:14 pm

Val wrote:now Thundril, lets not get too personal. Sorry, I thought you said Cock Festers.
You seem unusually well informed, Val. Is there something you want to tell us....?

User avatar
Ken H
Posts: 4256
Joined: February 22nd, 2009, 12:09 am

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#37 Post by Ken H » November 22nd, 2011, 7:08 pm

Dave B wrote:
Are we absolutely sure that there is no merit whatsoever in this stuff? I certainly am not qualified to read and understand maths beyond basic school maths and certain technical formulae that I have learned by rote.
Well, none of the other forums he has posted at seem to think so. The graphics are purdy though.

I sure wish I could play Mornington Crescent, but I understand it takes years of training, with a proficient mentor, to accomplish anything meaningful...
This is one of the great social functions of science - to free people of superstition. - Steven Weinberg

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#38 Post by Dave B » November 22nd, 2011, 7:14 pm

I sure wish I could play Mornington Crescent, but I understand it takes years of training, with a proficient mentor, to accomplish anything meaningful...
Don't be silly, Ken, any idiot can play it.
Spoiler:
You just have to be an idiot in the first place! :laughter:
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

Fia
Posts: 5480
Joined: July 6th, 2007, 8:29 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#39 Post by Fia » November 22nd, 2011, 8:27 pm

jdc wrote:
Fia wrote:I love TH :D Only here the proper response to mathspam is Mornington Crescent.
It's a common response to perceived trolling on the Bad Science forum.
Thank you jdc, there's not enough time for dipping into every fora so I hope the good folk of the Bad Science forum are heart-warmed by the homage :)
jdc wrote:(I'd join in the game, but I'm afraid I'm stuck in Nidd.)
Dunno if the Srdanova rules accept the traditional get-out-of-Nidd clause, but if they do I hereby pronounce you fully out of Niddness :D

Where were we? Maths? Don't get it but trust scientific process of peer review. msbiljanica, have you talked and worked with other mathematicians, say in local universities?


And following Oval I believe we must be at Sloane Square...

jdc
Posts: 516
Joined: January 27th, 2009, 9:03 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#40 Post by jdc » November 22nd, 2011, 9:58 pm

Why thank you Fia.

Hm. Sloane Square, eh? I think Kingsbury is my best bet. It's a slightly tricky manoeuvre though...
My Blog; Twitter.
Email: 325jdc325 (at) googlemail.com

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS

#41 Post by Alan H » November 22nd, 2011, 10:09 pm

msbiljanica

You are wasting your time. They are very pretty drawings, but you have explained nothing comprehensible. There may be just two possibilities:

1. You are a genius and this stuff is way over the heads of the good people here and you will be awarded the Fields Medal in a few years.
2. What you say is gobbledegook and nonsense.

I know which seems more likely to me.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

Post Reply