Latest post of the previous page:
*Well, even I (dim as I am) know that this is incorrecta) 7 +7 = 3
b) 4 +4 = 15
* not sure what term to use. Facetiousness? Sarcasm? Irony, even?
answers on a postcard etc.
Latest post of the previous page:
*Well, even I (dim as I am) know that this is incorrectgetreal wrote:*Well, even I (dim as I am) know that this is incorrect
a) 7 +7 = 3
b) 4 +4 = 15
* not sure what term to use. Facetiousness? Sarcasm? Irony, even?
answers on a postcard etc.
It's a common response to perceived trolling on the Bad Science forum.Fia wrote:I love TH Only here the proper response to mathspam is Mornington Crescent.
Seven Sisters
You seem unusually well informed, Val. Is there something you want to tell us....?Val wrote:now Thundril, lets not get too personal. Sorry, I thought you said Cock Festers.
Well, none of the other forums he has posted at seem to think so. The graphics are purdy though.Are we absolutely sure that there is no merit whatsoever in this stuff? I certainly am not qualified to read and understand maths beyond basic school maths and certain technical formulae that I have learned by rote.
Don't be silly, Ken, any idiot can play it.I sure wish I could play Mornington Crescent, but I understand it takes years of training, with a proficient mentor, to accomplish anything meaningful...
Thank you jdc, there's not enough time for dipping into every fora so I hope the good folk of the Bad Science forum are heart-warmed by the homagejdc wrote:It's a common response to perceived trolling on the Bad Science forum.Fia wrote:I love TH Only here the proper response to mathspam is Mornington Crescent.
Dunno if the Srdanova rules accept the traditional get-out-of-Nidd clause, but if they do I hereby pronounce you fully out of Niddnessjdc wrote:(I'd join in the game, but I'm afraid I'm stuck in Nidd.)