INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.

For further information, see our Privacy Policy.

Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

We are not accepting any new registrations.

The Atheist Bus Campaign - is it a good use of money?

Any topics that are primarily about humanism or other non-religious life stances fit in here.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Alan C.
Posts: 10356
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 3:35 pm

Re: The Atheist Bus Campaign - is it a good use of money?

#221 Post by Alan C. » October 9th, 2011, 4:59 pm

Latest post of the previous page:

I'm pretty sure he said on his own forum that he wouldn't debate Craig as it would seem to give him (Craig) credibility.
Abstinence Makes the Church Grow Fondlers.

Nick
Posts: 11027
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 10:10 am

Re: The Atheist Bus Campaign - is it a good use of money?

#222 Post by Nick » October 9th, 2011, 6:57 pm

Indeed, Alan C. IIRC (though I think he was quoting another scientist, possibly Richard Feynman,) Dawkins said that if he debated a creationist it would look great on their CV, but not on his. :D

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: The Atheist Bus Campaign - is it a good use of money?

#223 Post by Dave B » October 9th, 2011, 7:42 pm

Never thought about Feynman quotes - he has some good ones:
I can live with doubt, and uncertainty, and not knowing. I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

Maria Mac
Site Admin
Posts: 9306
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:34 pm

Re: The Atheist Bus Campaign - is it a good use of money?

#224 Post by Maria Mac » October 20th, 2011, 2:57 pm

Today's Guardian:

Dawkins on why he refuses to debate Craig


Craig on a story from the OT: "Can you imagine what it would be like to have to break into some house and kill a terrified woman and her children? The brutalising effect on these Israeli [sic] soldiers is disturbing."

Dawkins: "Oh, the poor soldiers. Let's hope they received counselling after their traumatic experience."

:laughter:

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: The Atheist Bus Campaign - is it a good use of money?

#225 Post by Dave B » October 20th, 2011, 3:16 pm

Oh dear, yet another, "Death is really salvation for heathens," type! He would have got on well with the priests who slaughtered Central American natives a few hundred years ago so they did not live a life of sin. It was good for their souls you know . . .
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

Nick
Posts: 11027
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 10:10 am

Re: The Atheist Bus Campaign - is it a good use of money?

#226 Post by Nick » October 20th, 2011, 4:38 pm

Beautifully written with devastating force. And I loved this line:
In the interests of transparency, I should point out that it isn't only Oxford that won't see me on the night Craig proposes to debate me in absentia: you can also see me not appear in Cambridge, Liverpool, Birmingham, Manchester, Edinburgh, Glasgow and, if time allows, Bristol.
:laughter:

I've cleared my diary to show that I'm making a really special effort not to appear in the auditorium in Oxford. Wouldn't it be nice if it were full of nothing but empty chairs.....? :D

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Atheist Bus Campaign - is it a good use of money?

#227 Post by Alan H » October 20th, 2011, 5:29 pm

:pointlaugh:
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

Post Reply