INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.

Scientific evidence of God (by an atheist)

Any topic related to science can be discussed here.
Message
Author
CodeGodJordan
Posts: 1
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 3:00 am

Scientific evidence of God (by an atheist)

#1 Postby CodeGodJordan » November 22nd, 2016, 6:27 am

NOTE [1]: No opinion, faith, emotion, nor bias was used in the facing sequence.
NOTE [2]: I am of course atheistic. (I have not any beliefs).
NOTE [3]: One needn’t belief/certainty to [OBSERVE] PROBABILITIES. [Such as the probabilities/statistics observed herein]


Image

NOTE: Here is an attractive VERSION OF ARTICLE, in image format: http://i.imgur.com/vNvaWxL.png


God is PROBABLY quite real. (however, not the omniscient, all powerful kind seen in religion)
We are simulating more and more detailed universes (Example ‘illustris’) as computing power increases, and creating more and more sophisticated artificial intelligence.
If this computing increase doesn’t end (ie we aren’t all wiped out) our simulations will eventually get detailed enough to contain INTELLIGENCE or create artificial intelligence that exceeds humans on all tasks (God-like software).
Then, (probably when we are still a mortal species, having not yet solved ageing…) we likely BECOME GODS, however NOT the OMNISCIENT, OMNIPOTENT God specified in religion.
In a similar way, it is likely that THE VERY UNIVERSE WE OCCUPY may have come about, and thus likewise, God (it’s creator(s)) is non-omnipotent, non-infinite etc.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
PROBABLE NON-OMNISCIENT GODS
**(1)** Man-made ‘General artificial intelligence’ (The brain based software we invent [that shall likely exceed humans in all tasks, not merely individual cognitive tasks/cognitive task groups as they do now]).
**(2)** Intelligence that EVOLVES in our own simulations to become God-like (ie they create universes, or ‘general artificial intelligence’-like programs).
**(3)** The non-omnipotent, non-infinite Gods (human like?) that created our universe stemming from a similar way, where we simulate more and more detailed universes via **(4)** — constrained paths. (eg illustris)
**(4)** Mankind; for mankind shall perhaps promptly possess God bound capabilities, via **(1)** and **(2)**.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
SCIENTIFIC-STATISTICS PAR PROBABLE NON-OMNISCIENT GODS
In SUMMARY, probabilistically, the ability to generate artificial intelligence, that surpasses the net intellect of one’s species, AND OR compute simulation of universes (with intellect resembling prior), IS THAT WHICH classifies said species as God-bound.
.
.
.
.
(The aforesaid definition, reduces the traditional deity-bound property sequence, abound scientifically observable probabilities/statistics, such that a particular property is evident — thusly the ability to forge non-trivial intelligence [vis a vis mankind]. Thereafter, said intelligence shall likely exceed the net intelligence of the creator’s(s’) species…whilst separately theist-theorized properties [omniscience, omnipotence etc] likely shan’t obtain, particularly on the horizon of aforesaid observable probabilities/statistics.)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
INTRODUCTION [A-B]:
[A] What data purports that SUPER-human ARTIFICIAL INTELLECT [Seen in **(1)** prior] is possible?
The human brain operates at roughly 10¹⁵ floating point operations per second.
NON-TRIVIALLY ACCESSIBLE super-computing platforms already exist, such that this operation cycle is attained. [Separately, existent, are (inorganic, efficient programmable synaptic material) 10¹⁴ of said +10¹⁶ compute modules]
TRIVIALLY ACCESSIBLE resources shall exist at 2020’s horizon, in tandem with KURZWEIL’S LAW OF ACCELERATING RETURNS, (and perhaps MOORE’S LAW/modern Moore’s law variants).
NOTE: As prior stipulated, brain based models already EXCEED/EQUAL human performance in non trivial individual cognitive tasks/cognitive task groups, ranging from language translation to disease diagnosis.
It is an observable factum, that the machine-executable-cognitive task field HAS BROADENED, as time (and computational parallelism) diverged. (Such a field’s broadening persists this day)
.
.
.
What data purports that SIMULATIONS [Seen in **(2)** prior] ARE possible?
Our universe is at least linear scale [Dirac], AND at most exponential order [inflation].
Therein, a simulation of such shall require an exponential order capable machine.
Exponential order capable machines exist today.
These are called quantum computers. (http://www.dwavesys.com/)
These quantum computers, though superior, are not yet sufficient to encode detailed universes (that contain intelligence).
However, VIA non-exponential machines (super-computers), THERE EXISTS QUITE DETAILED simulations of our universe (http://www.illustris-project.org/)
.
.
.
[b]CONCLUSION [C-D]:

Artificial intelligence, together with quantum computers, are enhancing in concurrence with measures such as KURZWEIL’S LAW OF ACCELERATING RETURNS.
Particularly, from these MEASURES, super-human Ai is PERHAPS INEVITABLE, and such shall therein PROBABLY occur within the scope of 20–40 years.
At this juncture, mankind shall maintain non-omniscience/non-omnipotence (Ageing yet solved, Energy issues persist et cetera).
.
.
[C] What data purports that SIMULATIONS [Seen in **(4)** prior] ARE possible?
Thereafter, man becomes non-omniscient, non-omnipotent Gods, having created super-human artificial intelligence, therein **(4)** is probable.
.
.
.
[D] What data purports that SIMULATIONS [Seen in **(3)** prior] ARE possible?
SEPARATELY, physicist James Gates’ adinkra postulation, (AND or the simulation hypothesis) shows that our universe, possesses
simulatory features, thereafter our universe may be simulatory.
If our universe is indeed simulatory, in a similar way [C] is probable, our creators are probable, and thereafter probably non-omniscient/non-omnipotent in the like.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
RESOURCE SUMMARY:
[i] Simulation sample: http://www.illustris-project.org/
[ii] Simulation Hypothesis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
[iii] Fascinating (though perhaps less viable than the simulation hypothesis): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvMlUepVgbA
[iv] ‘General’ artificial intelligence (a rather profound approximation) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xN1d3qHMIEQ
[v] PHYSICIST JEREMY ENGLAND SHOWS THAT MATTER ATTRIBUTES LIFE-LIKE PROPERTIES AS TIME DIVERGES: https://www.quantamagazine.org/20140122 ... y-of-life/
[vi] A quantum computing synopsis, of mine:[https://www.quora.com/How-does-quantum-computing-work/answer/Jordan-Bennett-9]
Essentially, see DWAVE.
[vii] Cognitive language translation :— http://www.pcworld.com/article/3022752/ ... users.html
[viii] Cognitive models for disease diagnosis: http://singularityhub.com/2015/11/11/ex ... ng-cancer/
[ix] Relevant graphs:
[a] Ray Kurzweil’s law of accelerating returns.
[b] Moore’s law [modern variants in the like]
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Author: http://folioverse.appspot.com/
Interlocution: https://www.facebook.com/ProgrammingGodJordan
Film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SasizIMHKOI
Naive source code qua God: https://github.com/JordanMicahBennett/God
Art: http://god-is-coming.appspot.com/

VINDICATOR
Posts: 340
Joined: December 22nd, 2016, 11:07 am

Re: Scientific evidence of God (by an atheist)

#2 Postby VINDICATOR » December 25th, 2016, 1:00 pm

CGJ,
Evidently you don't believe that God created man, but you believe that man can create "God"! (artificial super intelligence) Since there are sextillions of exoplanets that can support life, and taking account of your time-table, The probability of there being a huge number of "man"-made Gods out there is very great! Will these Gods have all the defects of man, like jealousy, cruelty, greediness, selfishness, etc.? If so then we can expect to see a "War of the Gods" on a Cosmic scale!


Return to “Sciences and pseudo-science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest