View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently April 18th, 2014, 7:10 pm



Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS 
Author Message
Alan H wrote:
msbiljanica

In words and sentences (no numbers or diagrams allowed) what is it you are trying to convince us of?

that mathematics can be simple, it can solve more problems than the current mathematics, that mathematics is actually a large geometry (which is why I mentioned mathematical space, along a natural, realistic along, Definition of the point), that every new thing will not give you an axiom that things related, that's my reason to show you my math


January 19th, 2012, 3:09 pm
User avatar

Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm
Posts: 13480
Location: Gloucester
msbiljanica wrote:
Alan H wrote:
msbiljanica

In words and sentences (no numbers or diagrams allowed) what is it you are trying to convince us of?

that mathematics can be simple, it can solve more problems than the current mathematics, that mathematics is actually a large geometry (which is why I mentioned mathematical space, along a natural, realistic along, Definition of the point), that every new thing will not give you an axiom that things related, that's my reason to show you my math
That does not describe your math - that is what we need, in the form you present it it is incomprehensible to us. This may be our lacking - please spell it out in simple words to humour us.

_________________
Life's too short for doing the dusting.


January 19th, 2012, 3:16 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
Posts: 14575
msbiljanica wrote:
Alan H wrote:
msbiljanica

In words and sentences (no numbers or diagrams allowed) what is it you are trying to convince us of?

that mathematics can be simple, it can solve more problems than the current mathematics, that mathematics is actually a large geometry (which is why I mentioned mathematical space, along a natural, realistic along, Definition of the point), that every new thing will not give you an axiom that things related, that's my reason to show you my math
How much 'conventional' mathematics do you know? Set theory? Topology? Vector analysis? Tensor theory?

_________________
Alan Henness

"We're all in this together, but some are more in it than others."
— Me, with apologies to Napoleon


January 19th, 2012, 7:06 pm
Profile WWW
PDF - http://www.mediafire.com/?mm3e9fb73g494sp
____________________________________________-
Presupposition-Srcko can join a number not that can not be in the structure srcko
Process:
P1 101070 and 5 , 5_101070
P2 5520 and 22 ,5520_22
P3 75 and 25 , 75_25
P4 68 and 2 ,2_68
...
General form -abc_d , d_abc , ab_d ,d_ab...
[S15]-pendant srcko
CM-[S15]-does no know
Note-only one number can be pendand , number two goes into a complex srcko
__________________________________________________________
Presupposition-Two ( more ) srcko (pendand srcko) are combined into one unit
Process:
P1 106 and 118 , 106118
P2 10565 and 703,10565_703
P3 30360 and 45277_78 ,30360_45277_78
...
General form -abcd, abc_de ,abc_def_g ,...
[S16]-two ( more) srcko
CM-[S16]-does no know


January 27th, 2012, 3:54 pm
User avatar

Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm
Posts: 13480
Location: Gloucester
AAAAAgh!

Sound of forum member deciding to end it all.

_________________
Life's too short for doing the dusting.


January 27th, 2012, 4:30 pm
Profile WWW
Presupposition-Two ( more ) srcko have the first ( last) common number
Process:
P1 10530 and 3330 , 10533(_30)
P2 4444 and 441094 and 44256 , 44(_44_)1094256
...
General form -abcd(_e) , ab(_c_)defg , ...
[S17]-two ( more) first-last srcko
CM-[S17]-does no know
______________________________________________________
Presupposition-In the expression a+(.b)c=d , d+(s.0)11 or d+(s.0)number (more) from 11
Process:
P1 3+(.s.0)5=8+(s.0)11, 3+(s.0)5<91
P2 5+(.0)5=5+(s.0)224 , 5+(.0)5<729
...
General form - a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)11 ,a+(s.b)c<e1
a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)e , a+(.b)c<f
a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)efg , a+(.b)c<hij ...
[S18]-left inequality
CM-[S18]-know
_______________________________________
2+5=7 , 2+10=12 , 2+15=17, 2+20=22 , 2+25=27 , 2+30=32 , 2+35=37 , 2+38=40,
2+40=42, 2+41=43 , 2+44=46 , 2+45=47, 2+47=49 , 2+50=52 ,2+57=59 , 2+60=62 ,
2+64=66, 2+70=72, 2+71=73 , 2+78=80 , 2+80=82 , 2+85=87 , 2+90=92 ,2+92=94
srcko
5550={5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50}
38350={38,41,44,47,50}
501090={50,60,70,80,90}
50792={50,57,64,71,78,85,92}
two(more) first-last srcko
55383(_50_)1090792
remains part of the function, when we come to it


January 28th, 2012, 11:10 am
Presupposition-Parts number (a) and mobile number (b ) have a contact , the contact is delete
Process:
P1 4-(.0)2=2
P2 4-(.1)2=¤1(2)1¤ image
P3 4-(.2)2=2
P4 4-(.3)2=¤3(1)1¤
P5 4-(.4)2=¤4(0)2¤
Attachment:
a12.png
a12.png [ 40.76 KiB | Viewed 631 times ]

General form
a-(.0)b=c
a-(.1)b=c
...
a-(.d)b=c
[S19]-subtraction
CM-only form a-(s.0/s.0)b=c , others do not know , axiom
_______________________________________________________________________
Presupposition-In the expression a+(.b)c=d , d-(s.0/s.0))11f or d-(s.0/s.0))number (more) from 11f
Process:
P1 3+(.s.0)5=8-(s.0/s.0))118 , 3+(s.0)5>017
P2 5+(.0)5=5-(s.0/s.0))224 , 5+(.0)5>321
...
General form - a+(.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0))11f ,a+(s.b)c>01e
a+(.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0)e , a+(.b)c>f
a+(.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0)efg , a+(.b)c>hij ...
[S20]-right inequality addition
CM-[S20]-know


January 29th, 2012, 9:53 am
User avatar

Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
Posts: 14575
I have warned msbiljanica on two occasions that he needed to engage with the others here and answer the fundamental questions being asked.

The final deadline to do so has just passed without any such engagement. Instead, we got a repetition of the same incongruous and undecipherable nonsense. I appreciate there is an obvious language difficulty, but we were making no progress whatsoever.

He is therefore now banned from posting again.

_________________
Alan Henness

"We're all in this together, but some are more in it than others."
— Me, with apologies to Napoleon


January 29th, 2012, 12:36 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: July 5th, 2007, 5:53 pm
Posts: 8570
Location: Huddersfield, England
Shit! I shall have to be careful - don't want to be too clever here ! :hilarity:


January 29th, 2012, 2:57 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
Posts: 14575
Waste 10 minutes of your time watching this utter drivel: Vortex-Based Mathematics. This is a TED conference. How they let their standards slip...

_________________
Alan Henness

"We're all in this together, but some are more in it than others."
— Me, with apologies to Napoleon


March 31st, 2012, 5:03 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm
Posts: 13480
Location: Gloucester
As you said, Alan, what has happened to their standards?

I wanted to see him put that magnet in a bowl down somewhere else and see if it still moved. It looked awfully like same technique the fakers use with "pendulums" to test for the gender of a child or whatever, very small hand movements, shoving or tipping, can make a mass move quite a lot.

_________________
Life's too short for doing the dusting.


March 31st, 2012, 5:31 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.