Author 
Message 
msbiljanica

Alan H wrote: msbiljanica
In words and sentences (no numbers or diagrams allowed) what is it you are trying to convince us of? that mathematics can be simple, it can solve more problems than the current mathematics, that mathematics is actually a large geometry (which is why I mentioned mathematical space, along a natural, realistic along, Definition of the point), that every new thing will not give you an axiom that things related, that's my reason to show you my math

January 19th, 2012, 3:09 pm 


Dave B
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm Posts: 13537 Location: Gloucester

msbiljanica wrote: Alan H wrote: msbiljanica
In words and sentences (no numbers or diagrams allowed) what is it you are trying to convince us of? that mathematics can be simple, it can solve more problems than the current mathematics, that mathematics is actually a large geometry (which is why I mentioned mathematical space, along a natural, realistic along, Definition of the point), that every new thing will not give you an axiom that things related, that's my reason to show you my math That does not describe your math  that is what we need, in the form you present it it is incomprehensible to us. This may be our lacking  please spell it out in simple words to humour us.
_________________ Life's too short for doing the dusting.

January 19th, 2012, 3:16 pm 


Alan H
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm Posts: 14615

msbiljanica wrote: Alan H wrote: msbiljanica
In words and sentences (no numbers or diagrams allowed) what is it you are trying to convince us of? that mathematics can be simple, it can solve more problems than the current mathematics, that mathematics is actually a large geometry (which is why I mentioned mathematical space, along a natural, realistic along, Definition of the point), that every new thing will not give you an axiom that things related, that's my reason to show you my math How much 'conventional' mathematics do you know? Set theory? Topology? Vector analysis? Tensor theory?
_________________ Alan Henness
"We're all in this together, but some are more in it than others." — Me, with apologies to Napoleon

January 19th, 2012, 7:06 pm 


msbiljanica

PDF  http://www.mediafire.com/?mm3e9fb73g494sp____________________________________________ PresuppositionSrcko can join a number not that can not be in the structure srcko Process: P1 10 _{10}70 and 5 , 5_10 _{10}70 P2 5 _{5}20 and 22 ,5 ^{5}20_22 P3 7 _{5} and 25 , 7 _{5}_25 P4 6 _{8} and 2 ,2_6 _{8} ... General form a _{b}c_d , d_a _{b}c , a _{b}_d ,d_a _{b}... [S15]pendant srcko CM[S15]does no know Noteonly one number can be pendand , number two goes into a complex srcko __________________________________________________________ PresuppositionTwo ( more ) srcko (pendand srcko) are combined into one unit Process: P1 10 _{6} and 11 _{8} , 10 _{6}11 _{8} P2 10 _{5}65 and 70 _{3},10 _{5}65_70 _{3} P3 30 _{3}60 and 45 _{2}77_78 ,30 _{3}60_45 _{2}77_78 ... General form a _{b}c _{d}, a _{b}c_d _{e} ,a _{b}c_d _{e}f_g ,... [S16]two ( more) srcko CM[S16]does no know

January 27th, 2012, 3:54 pm 


Dave B
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm Posts: 13537 Location: Gloucester

AAAAAgh!
Sound of forum member deciding to end it all.
_________________ Life's too short for doing the dusting.

January 27th, 2012, 4:30 pm 


msbiljanica

PresuppositionTwo ( more ) srcko have the first ( last) common number Process: P1 10_{5}30 and 3_{3}30 , 10_{5}3_{3}(_30) P2 4_{4}44 and 44_{10}94 and 44_{2}56 , 44(_44_)_{10}94_{2}56 ... General form a_{b}c_{d}(_e) , a_{b}(_c_)_{d}e_{f}g , ... [S17]two ( more) firstlast srcko CM[S17]does no know ______________________________________________________ PresuppositionIn the expression a+(.b)c=d , d+(s.0)1_{1} or d+(s.0)number (more) from 1_{1} Process: P1 3+(.s.0)5=8+(s.0)1_{1}, 3+(s.0)5<9_{1} P2 5+(.0)5=5+(s.0)2_{2}4 , 5+(.0)5<7_{2}9 ... General form  a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)1_{1} ,a+(s.b)c<e_{1} a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)e , a+(.b)c<f a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)e_{f}g , a+(.b)c<h_{i}j ... [S18]left inequality CM[S18]know _______________________________________ 2+5=7 , 2+10=12 , 2+15=17, 2+20=22 , 2+25=27 , 2+30=32 , 2+35=37 , 2+38=40, 2+40=42, 2+41=43 , 2+44=46 , 2+45=47, 2+47=49 , 2+50=52 ,2+57=59 , 2+60=62 , 2+64=66, 2+70=72, 2+71=73 , 2+78=80 , 2+80=82 , 2+85=87 , 2+90=92 ,2+92=94 srcko 5_{5}50={5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50} 38_{3}50={38,41,44,47,50} 50_{10}90={50,60,70,80,90} 50_{7}92={50,57,64,71,78,85,92} two(more) firstlast srcko 5_{5}38_{3}(_50_)_{10}90_{7}92 remains part of the function, when we come to it

January 28th, 2012, 11:10 am 


msbiljanica

PresuppositionParts number (a) and mobile number (b ) have a contact , the contact is delete Process: P1 4(.0)2=2 P2 4(.1)2=¤1(2)1¤ image P3 4(.2)2=2 P4 4(.3)2=¤3(1)1¤ P5 4(.4)2=¤4(0)2¤ Attachment:
a12.png [ 40.76 KiB  Viewed 632 times ]
General form a(.0)b=c a(.1)b=c ... a(.d)b=c [S19]subtraction CMonly form a(s.0/s.0)b=c , others do not know , axiom _______________________________________________________________________ PresuppositionIn the expression a+(.b)c=d , d(s.0/s.0))1 _{1}f or d(s.0/s.0))number (more) from 1 _{1}f Process: P1 3+(.s.0)5=8(s.0/s.0))1 _{1}8 , 3+(s.0)5>0 _{1}7 P2 5+(.0)5=5(s.0/s.0))2 _{2}4 , 5+(.0)5>3 _{2}1 ... General form  a+(.b)c=d(s.0/s.0))1 _{1}f ,a+(s.b)c>0 _{1}e a+(.b)c=d(s.0/s.0)e , a+(.b)c>f a+(.b)c=d(s.0/s.0)e _{f}g , a+(.b)c>h _{i}j ... [S20]right inequality addition CM[S20]know

January 29th, 2012, 9:53 am 


Alan H
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm Posts: 14615

I have warned msbiljanica on two occasions that he needed to engage with the others here and answer the fundamental questions being asked.
The final deadline to do so has just passed without any such engagement. Instead, we got a repetition of the same incongruous and undecipherable nonsense. I appreciate there is an obvious language difficulty, but we were making no progress whatsoever.
He is therefore now banned from posting again.
_________________ Alan Henness
"We're all in this together, but some are more in it than others." — Me, with apologies to Napoleon

January 29th, 2012, 12:36 pm 


jaywhat
Joined: July 5th, 2007, 5:53 pm Posts: 8589 Location: Huddersfield, England

Shit! I shall have to be careful  don't want to be too clever here !

January 29th, 2012, 2:57 pm 


Alan H
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm Posts: 14615

Waste 10 minutes of your time watching this utter drivel: VortexBased Mathematics. This is a TED conference. How they let their standards slip...
_________________ Alan Henness
"We're all in this together, but some are more in it than others." — Me, with apologies to Napoleon

March 31st, 2012, 5:03 pm 


Dave B
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm Posts: 13537 Location: Gloucester

As you said, Alan, what has happened to their standards?
I wanted to see him put that magnet in a bowl down somewhere else and see if it still moved. It looked awfully like same technique the fakers use with "pendulums" to test for the gender of a child or whatever, very small hand movements, shoving or tipping, can make a mass move quite a lot.
_________________ Life's too short for doing the dusting.

March 31st, 2012, 5:31 pm 


Who is online 
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest 

You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum

