INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.

The Nightingale Collaboration

Any topic related to science can be discussed here.
Message
Author
User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#341 Postby Alan H » October 29th, 2014, 1:15 pm

Latest post of the previous page:

jaywhat wrote:The Nightingale Collaboration gets a mention in Ninny's biography of Lizzy af Hageby 'Animal Rights and Public Wrongs' which I have just bought from Amazon.
It was delivered today - very exciting !
What??? How on earth did that happen?
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Altfish
Posts: 1821
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 8:46 am

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#342 Postby Altfish » October 29th, 2014, 1:16 pm

Are there problems with the Nightingale Collaboration website today?

I keep getting...
Database connection error (2): Could not connect to MySQL.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#343 Postby Alan H » October 29th, 2014, 2:08 pm

Altfish wrote:Are there problems with the Nightingale Collaboration website today?

I keep getting...
Database connection error (2): Could not connect to MySQL.
Oh...thanks for letting me know...I'll investigate.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Ninny
Posts: 545
Joined: December 13th, 2007, 12:03 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#344 Postby Ninny » October 29th, 2014, 2:35 pm

Hello, Alan! My book is a biography of an Edwardian animal rights activist. She was a wonderful campaigner, but she had a woo side, believed in homeopathy and many other fringe ideas. The last chapter of the book is called Lizzy's Legacy, and I write briefly about what happened to some of her campaigns, and mentioning the NC seemed the appropriate way of rounding off the bit about homeopathy. I'm actually very proud of this book! available on Amazon and Kindle (a fact of which I am not proud, but how else to get a publisher?)

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#345 Postby Alan H » October 29th, 2014, 3:13 pm

Alan H wrote:
Altfish wrote:Are there problems with the Nightingale Collaboration website today?

I keep getting...
Database connection error (2): Could not connect to MySQL.
Oh...thanks for letting me know...I'll investigate.
Don't yet know what the problem was but I raised a support ticket and it's now back up. I do have an automatic hourly monitor on all my websites so I do find out, but that's on my other machine...

Thanks for letting me know!
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#346 Postby Alan H » November 12th, 2014, 3:05 pm

The Nightingale Collaboration: We can't win them all...
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#347 Postby Dave B » November 12th, 2014, 5:04 pm

Ah, well, you have still done a brilliant job!
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#348 Postby Alan H » November 12th, 2014, 5:10 pm

Ta.

It's worth posting a summary and a chart of our ASA successes:

16 upheld adjudications
3 partly upheld adjudications
1 not upheld adjudication
23 informally resolved cases
87 issues investigated
243 instances of CAP Code breached identified
20 instances of CAP Code not breached identified
66 breaches of CAP Code 3.1 Misleading advertising
63 breaches of CAP Code 3.7 Substantiation (ie where the advertiser was unable to substantiate the claims made)
79 breaches of the CAP Codes on medical claims

ASA Summary - 12 November 2014.gif
ASA Summary - 12 November 2014.gif (25.54 KiB) Viewed 3122 times
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Altfish
Posts: 1821
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 8:46 am

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#349 Postby Altfish » November 12th, 2014, 5:11 pm

Yup, beers all round. :smile:

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#350 Postby Alan H » November 12th, 2014, 6:16 pm

:thumbsup:
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#351 Postby Alan H » December 7th, 2014, 3:11 pm

The Nightingale Collaboration: PSA re-affirms official approval of the CNHC
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#352 Postby Dave B » December 7th, 2014, 5:26 pm

Blimey, lot of work in there, Alan, all credit to those carrying it out! :notworthy:
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#353 Postby Alan H » December 7th, 2014, 5:32 pm

Dave B wrote:Blimey, lot of work in there, Alan, all credit to those carrying it out! :notworthy:
Wot? You didn't read all of it, did you? :D
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#354 Postby Dave B » December 7th, 2014, 6:47 pm

Alan H wrote:
Dave B wrote:Blimey, lot of work in there, Alan, all credit to those carrying it out! :notworthy:
Wot? You didn't read all of it, did you? :D
No chance, learned to scan such long ago. Number of words and presentation of subject good indicators of amount of research and reiteration, and thus time, involved!
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#355 Postby Alan H » December 9th, 2014, 12:30 pm

The Nightingale Collaboration: NHS Lanarkshire set to end referrals to Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital

Not: it's a lot shorter than the last one!
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#356 Postby Alan H » December 9th, 2014, 3:03 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan C.
Posts: 10356
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 3:35 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#357 Postby Alan C. » December 10th, 2014, 10:16 pm

good job all concerned :thumbsup:
Abstinence Makes the Church Grow Fondlers.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#358 Postby Alan H » December 10th, 2014, 11:29 pm

We didn't do much - just submitted our response to the consultation.

I may be quoted in the papers tomorrow - I'll let you know.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#359 Postby Dave B » December 11th, 2014, 9:35 am

Alan H wrote:We didn't do much - just submitted our response to the consultation.

I may be quoted in the papers tomorrow - I'll let you know.
What "rank" are you now, Alan? "Spokesman", "Campaigner" . . . ?

But I agree with Alan C., if you and others do not respond to such things nowt gets done.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22954
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#360 Postby Alan H » December 11th, 2014, 10:49 am

Dave B wrote:
Alan H wrote:We didn't do much - just submitted our response to the consultation.

I may be quoted in the papers tomorrow - I'll let you know.
What "rank" are you now, Alan? "Spokesman", "Campaigner" . . . ?

But I agree with Alan C., if you and others do not respond to such things nowt gets done.
Oh, serial complainer, at least!
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: The Nightingale Collaboration

#361 Postby Dave B » December 11th, 2014, 11:23 am

Alan H wrote:
Dave B wrote:
Alan H wrote:We didn't do much - just submitted our response to the consultation.

I may be quoted in the papers tomorrow - I'll let you know.
What "rank" are you now, Alan? "Spokesman", "Campaigner" . . . ?

But I agree with Alan C., if you and others do not respond to such things nowt gets done.
Oh, serial complainer, at least!
Ah, "Campaigner" then!
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015


Return to “Sciences and pseudo-science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests