http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11676
If link fails, cut, paste, and join up
http://www.nap.edu/
catalog.php?
record_id=11676
Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years
Description:
In response to a request from Congress, Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years assesses the state of scientific efforts to reconstruct surface temperature records for Earth during approximately the last 2,000 years and the implications of these efforts ...
An authoritative survey with chapters on methodology (tree rings, ice cores, isotopic fractionation ...)
INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
Climate in last 2000 years; free Nat Academies Press e-book
-
Paul Braterman
- Posts: 34
- Joined: January 4th, 2010, 1:47 pm
Re: Climate in last 2000 years; free Nat Academies Press e-book
Links like that should work fine, or embed them with the url tags:
[url=http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11676]This[/url] is interesting.
[url=http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11676]This[/url] is interesting.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?