INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.

The Natural World

Any topic related to science can be discussed here.
Message
Author
User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22416
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#601 Postby Alan H » November 28th, 2015, 1:14 am

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22416
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#602 Postby Alan H » January 11th, 2016, 11:13 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22416
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#603 Postby Alan H » October 22nd, 2016, 8:39 am

Some fantastic photos in the Comedy Wildlife Photo Awards 2016.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

yash
Posts: 1
Joined: November 11th, 2016, 6:25 am

Re: The Natural World

#604 Postby yash » November 12th, 2016, 7:15 am

The world is great with the present of nature. But we are polluting them.

By the way good work.

Today I introduce a website which explains you the science in every work in our daily life.

http://howwhywhat.net - How Why What - Learn science in our daily life

This How Why What is a science daily website where you can learn the science & technology hidden in our daily life. The science lies in every work in our daily life, we are going to explain to you that amazing hidden science in our daily works.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22416
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#605 Postby Alan H » November 20th, 2016, 12:12 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22416
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#606 Postby Alan H » December 5th, 2016, 10:38 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22416
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#607 Postby Alan H » February 15th, 2017, 4:06 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22416
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#608 Postby Alan H » February 24th, 2017, 10:40 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22416
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#609 Postby Alan H » June 5th, 2017, 9:49 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Tetenterre
Posts: 3203
Joined: March 13th, 2011, 11:36 am

Re: The Natural World

#610 Postby Tetenterre » January 6th, 2018, 1:26 pm

As far as I can ascertain, this bit of pareidolia is genuine. Photographed by Daniel Biber from Hilzingen, Germany.

Starling_bird.jpg
Starling_bird.jpg (31.81 KiB) Viewed 101 times
Steve

Quantum Theory: The branch of science with which people who know absolutely sod all about quantum theory can explain anything.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22416
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: The Natural World

#611 Postby Alan H » January 6th, 2018, 1:58 pm

Tetenterre wrote:As far as I can ascertain, this bit of pareidolia is genuine. Photographed by Daniel Biber from Hilzingen, Germany.

Starling_bird.jpg
Lovely!
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?


Return to “Sciences and pseudo-science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest