INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our
Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
Enter here for humour and irreverence.
-
Fia
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: July 6th, 2007, 8:29 pm
#761
Post
by Fia » August 23rd, 2012, 7:25 pm
Latest post of the previous page:
Cue accusations of aggressive atheists... and doesn't the US have any rules about what public billboards can say? (silly me, we've seen enough daft ones from the other side.) This wouldn't be allowed in the UK though...
edited to correct spelling 
-
Nick
- Posts: 11027
- Joined: July 4th, 2007, 10:10 am
#762
Post
by Nick » August 24th, 2012, 4:23 pm
I'm not sure how effective it is, but considering the ads from Christians, it seems only fair. Perhaps its main benefit is to make simple atheism seem less extreme. Such in-yer-face advertising holds the door open for the moderates to walk through.
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#763
Post
by Alan H » August 24th, 2012, 9:54 pm
I have no idea...
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Dave B
- Posts: 17809
- Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm
#764
Post
by Dave B » August 24th, 2012, 10:13 pm
Is it bit like what the black cabbies used to do with the old meters to indicate that they were either hired or off duty I wonder?
Or is it a switch to put the Patriarch on standby . . .
Or maybe the headroom in the car is an inch too low . . .
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015
-
stevenw888
- Posts: 694
- Joined: July 16th, 2010, 12:48 pm
#765
Post
by stevenw888 » August 28th, 2012, 6:09 pm
The forthcoming U.S elections are proving fascinating! Here is the Republicans guide to female anatomy...
-
Attachments
-
- Republican Anatomy.jpg (146.55 KiB) Viewed 2991 times
"There are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are no old, bold pilots." - From the film "Top Gun"
-
Fia
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: July 6th, 2007, 8:29 pm
#766
Post
by Fia » August 28th, 2012, 9:54 pm
The only glimmer of hope I see in the above is that all these men who have so much wrong to say about women have at least got something right:
Breasts are for feeding babies.
-
Dave B
- Posts: 17809
- Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm
#767
Post
by Dave B » August 28th, 2012, 9:58 pm
Fia wrote:The only glimmer of hope I see in the above is that all these men who have so much wrong to say about women have at least got something right:
Breasts are for feeding babies.
Well, I suppose it just goes to show that one kind of booby
can recognise another . . .
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#768
Post
by Alan H » September 3rd, 2012, 11:07 am
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
stevenw888
- Posts: 694
- Joined: July 16th, 2010, 12:48 pm
#769
Post
by stevenw888 » September 6th, 2012, 4:31 pm
Flantastic!
-
Attachments
-
- smartyass-graffiti-18.jpg (26.36 KiB) Viewed 2893 times
"There are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are no old, bold pilots." - From the film "Top Gun"
-
Dave B
- Posts: 17809
- Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm
#771
Post
by Dave B » September 6th, 2012, 8:22 pm
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015
-
Tetenterre
- Posts: 3244
- Joined: March 13th, 2011, 11:36 am
#772
Post
by Tetenterre » September 7th, 2012, 10:26 am
Steve
Quantum Theory: The branch of science with which people who know absolutely sod all about quantum theory can explain anything.
-
Dave B
- Posts: 17809
- Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm
#773
Post
by Dave B » September 17th, 2012, 9:39 am
Pesky pecker!
-
Attachments
-
- woodpeckerark.jpg (34.79 KiB) Viewed 2782 times
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015
-
Lifelinking
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: July 4th, 2007, 11:56 am
#774
Post
by Lifelinking » September 23rd, 2012, 9:12 pm
"Who thinks the law has anything to do with justice? It's what we have because we can't have justice."
William McIlvanney
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#775
Post
by Alan H » September 23rd, 2012, 9:14 pm
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Fia
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: July 6th, 2007, 8:29 pm
#776
Post
by Fia » September 26th, 2012, 9:42 pm
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#777
Post
by Alan H » October 2nd, 2012, 7:08 pm
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#778
Post
by Alan H » October 21st, 2012, 10:18 pm
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Tetenterre
- Posts: 3244
- Joined: March 13th, 2011, 11:36 am
#779
Post
by Tetenterre » October 22nd, 2012, 5:36 pm
I believe that started life as a
Ricky Gervais tweet.
Steve
Quantum Theory: The branch of science with which people who know absolutely sod all about quantum theory can explain anything.
-
Alan H
- Posts: 24067
- Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm
#780
Post
by Alan H » October 22nd, 2012, 6:00 pm
Ah!
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
-
Fia
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: July 6th, 2007, 8:29 pm
#781
Post
by Fia » October 29th, 2012, 4:42 pm
Here's one that I think LL will particularly enjoy:
And lovely to see you around again 
